DY vs. CLS
DY (Dycom Industries, Inc.) and CLS (Celestica Inc.) are both stocks. DY operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials), while CLS operates in Electronic Components (Technology). Over the past 10 years, DY returned 18.40%/yr vs 43.16%/yr for CLS. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DY vs. CLS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DY achieves a 35.80% return, which is significantly higher than CLS's 30.75% return. Over the past 10 years, DY has underperformed CLS with an annualized return of 18.40%, while CLS has yielded a comparatively higher 43.16% annualized return.
DY
- 1D
- -1.59%
- 1M
- 7.13%
- YTD
- 35.80%
- 6M
- 31.51%
- 1Y
- 88.82%
- 3Y*
- 61.44%
- 5Y*
- 41.13%
- 10Y*
- 18.40%
CLS
- 1D
- 3.98%
- 1M
- 2.92%
- YTD
- 30.75%
- 6M
- 13.42%
- 1Y
- 220.14%
- 3Y*
- 209.55%
- 5Y*
- 114.81%
- 10Y*
- 43.16%
DY vs. CLS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DY Dycom Industries, Inc. | 35.80% | 94.13% | 51.24% | 22.96% | -0.17% | 24.15% | 60.17% | -12.75% | -51.50% | 38.78% |
CLS Celestica Inc. | 30.75% | 220.27% | 215.23% | 159.80% | 1.26% | 37.92% | -2.42% | -5.70% | -16.32% | -11.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between DY and CLS is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 1998 | 0.37 |
Fundamentals
DY:
$13.94B
CLS:
$44.72B
DY:
$10.52
CLS:
$8.28
DY:
43.60
CLS:
46.65
DY:
0.61
CLS:
0.63
DY:
2.17
CLS:
3.24
DY:
7.35
CLS:
21.31
DY:
$6.25B
CLS:
$13.81B
DY:
$1.23B
CLS:
$1.60B
DY:
$1.07B
CLS:
$1.32B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DY vs. CLS — Risk / Return Rank
DY
CLS
DY vs. CLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dycom Industries, Inc. (DY) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DY | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.39 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.65 | 7.58 | -3.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.35 | 18.88 | -6.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DY | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.96 | 3.06 | -1.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 | 2.01 | -1.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | 0.87 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.27 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
DY vs. CLS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DY drawdown since its inception was -93.54%, roughly equal to the maximum CLS drawdown of -96.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DY and CLS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DY | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.54% | -96.93% | +3.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.43% | -29.24% | +4.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.58% | -53.96% | +21.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.70% | -53.96% | +20.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -89.01% | -80.60% | -8.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.26% | -18.18% | +3.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.66% | -73.36% | +27.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.24% | 11.72% | -4.48% |
Volatility
DY vs. CLS - Volatility Comparison
Dycom Industries, Inc. (DY) and Celestica Inc. (CLS) have volatilities of 25.89% and 26.60%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DY | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.89% | 26.60% | -0.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.22% | 55.08% | -16.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.58% | 72.52% | -26.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.52% | 57.62% | -14.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.95% | 49.93% | +3.02% |
Dividends
DY vs. CLS - Dividend Comparison
Neither DY nor CLS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
DY vs. CLS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Dycom Industries, Inc. and Celestica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
DY vs. CLS - Profitability Comparison
DY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dycom Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 275.08M and revenue of 1.96B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.0%.
CLS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a gross profit of 437.20M and revenue of 4.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.8%.
DY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dycom Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 143.75M and revenue of 1.96B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.3%.
CLS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported an operating income of 272.10M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.7%.
DY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dycom Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 91.29M and revenue of 1.96B, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.
CLS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a net income of 212.30M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
DY and CLS have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CLS has higher volatility (26.60%) compared to DY (25.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DY dropped -93.54% vs CLS's -96.93%.
CLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.06 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DY and CLS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer