PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DXLG vs. ACLS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DXLG vs. ACLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Destination XL Group, Inc. (DXLG) and Axcelis Technologies, Inc. (ACLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DXLG achieves a -24.74% return, which is significantly lower than ACLS's 112.92% return. Over the past 10 years, DXLG has underperformed ACLS with an annualized return of -17.50%, while ACLS has yielded a comparatively higher 32.01% annualized return.


DXLG

1D
4.45%
1M
-6.49%
YTD
-24.74%
6M
-23.21%
1Y
-34.10%
3Y*
-47.78%
5Y*
-26.52%
10Y*
-17.50%

ACLS

1D
-6.99%
1M
9.00%
YTD
112.92%
6M
104.37%
1Y
157.12%
3Y*
0.51%
5Y*
34.01%
10Y*
32.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DXLG vs. ACLS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DXLG
Destination XL Group, Inc.
-24.74%-65.82%-38.86%-34.81%18.84%2,018.61%-79.05%-41.01%-1.36%-48.24%
ACLS
Axcelis Technologies, Inc.
112.92%14.98%-46.13%63.42%6.44%156.04%20.83%35.39%-37.98%97.25%

Correlation

The correlation between DXLG and ACLS is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2000

0.22

The correlation between DXLG and ACLS shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (1 year) to 0.32 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DXLG:

$38.00M

ACLS:

$5.30B

EPS

DXLG:

-$0.73

ACLS:

$3.21

PS Ratio

DXLG:

0.09

ACLS:

6.36

PB Ratio

DXLG:

0.37

ACLS:

5.07

Total Revenue (TTM)

DXLG:

$432.82M

ACLS:

$845.44M

Gross Profit (TTM)

DXLG:

$171.83M

ACLS:

$368.66M

EBITDA (TTM)

DXLG:

$741.00K

ACLS:

$129.11M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DXLG vs. ACLS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DXLG
DXLG Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
DXLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DXLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
DXLG Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
DXLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
DXLG Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

ACLS
ACLS Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
ACLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACLS Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
ACLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACLS Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DXLG vs. ACLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Destination XL Group, Inc. (DXLG) and Axcelis Technologies, Inc. (ACLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DXLGACLSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.40

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.47

6.03

-6.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.76

13.91

-14.67

DXLG vs. ACLS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DXLG Sharpe Ratio is -0.38, which is lower than the ACLS Sharpe Ratio of 2.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DXLG and ACLS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DXLG vs. ACLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DXLG drawdown since its inception was -99.18%, roughly equal to the maximum ACLS drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXLG and ACLS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DXLGACLSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.18%

-99.38%

+0.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-72.12%

-26.20%

-45.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-91.51%

-78.84%

-12.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-95.02%

-78.84%

-16.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.29%

-78.84%

-17.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-97.23%

-14.67%

-82.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-78.19%

-73.43%

-4.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

45.06%

11.34%

+33.72%

Volatility

DXLG vs. ACLS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Destination XL Group, Inc. (DXLG) is 13.65%, while Axcelis Technologies, Inc. (ACLS) has a volatility of 24.47%. This indicates that DXLG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DXLGACLSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.65%

24.47%

-10.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

57.83%

49.71%

+8.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

90.14%

59.36%

+30.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

66.51%

55.42%

+11.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

82.93%

53.76%

+29.17%

Dividends

DXLG vs. ACLS - Dividend Comparison

Neither DXLG nor ACLS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

DXLG vs. ACLS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Destination XL Group, Inc. and Axcelis Technologies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00M20222023202420252026
103.34M
198.96M
(DXLG) Total Revenue
(ACLS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

DXLG vs. ACLS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Destination XL Group, Inc. and Axcelis Technologies, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
44.3%
40.5%
Portfolio components
DXLG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Destination XL Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 45.75M and revenue of 103.34M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.3%.

ACLS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Axcelis Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 80.58M and revenue of 198.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.5%.

DXLG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Destination XL Group, Inc. reported an operating income of -4.70M and revenue of 103.34M, resulting in an operating margin of -4.6%.

ACLS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Axcelis Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 7.95M and revenue of 198.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.0%.

DXLG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Destination XL Group, Inc. reported a net income of -5.94M and revenue of 103.34M, resulting in a net margin of -5.8%.

ACLS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Axcelis Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 9.21M and revenue of 198.96M, resulting in a net margin of 4.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DXLG and ACLS have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ACLS has higher volatility (24.47%) compared to DXLG (13.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DXLG dropped -99.18% vs ACLS's -99.38%.

ACLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DXLG and ACLS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer