PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Portfolios
Screeners
Discussions
ACLS vs. BDC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

ACLS vs. BDC

Last updated May 16, 2025

Compare and contrast key facts about Axcelis Technologies, Inc. (ACLS) and Belden Inc. (BDC).

Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ACLS or BDC.

Correlation

The correlation between ACLS and BDC is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

ACLS vs. BDC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Axcelis Technologies, Inc. (ACLS) and Belden Inc. (BDC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ACLS:

-0.79

BDC:

0.49

Sortino Ratio

ACLS:

-1.05

BDC:

1.09

Omega Ratio

ACLS:

0.87

BDC:

1.14

Calmar Ratio

ACLS:

-0.56

BDC:

0.65

Martin Ratio

ACLS:

-0.95

BDC:

1.73

Ulcer Index

ACLS:

46.46%

BDC:

12.56%

Daily Std Dev

ACLS:

56.25%

BDC:

36.94%

Max Drawdown

ACLS:

-99.34%

BDC:

-85.69%

Current Drawdown

ACLS:

-68.74%

BDC:

-14.78%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ACLS:

$2.02B

BDC:

$4.42B

EPS

ACLS:

$5.46

BDC:

$5.17

PE Ratio

ACLS:

11.49

BDC:

21.65

PEG Ratio

ACLS:

1.23

BDC:

2.14

PS Ratio

ACLS:

2.10

BDC:

1.73

PB Ratio

ACLS:

1.97

BDC:

3.65

Total Revenue (TTM)

ACLS:

$958.06M

BDC:

$2.55B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ACLS:

$427.37M

BDC:

$956.53M

EBITDA (TTM)

ACLS:

$206.70M

BDC:

$371.91M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACLS achieves a -10.30% return, which is significantly lower than BDC's -0.57% return. Over the past 10 years, ACLS has outperformed BDC with an annualized return of 17.22%, while BDC has yielded a comparatively lower 3.02% annualized return.

ACLS

YTD

-10.30%

1M

32.86%

6M

-20.52%

1Y

-44.51%

5Y*

21.73%

10Y*

17.22%

BDC

YTD

-0.57%

1M

17.87%

6M

-6.51%

1Y

17.84%

5Y*

32.59%

10Y*

3.02%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

ACLS vs. BDC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ACLS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ACLS is 1515
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ACLS is 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ACLS is 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ACLS is 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ACLS is 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ACLS is 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
BDC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BDC is 7070
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BDC is 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BDC is 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BDC is 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BDC is 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BDC is 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ACLS vs. BDC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Axcelis Technologies, Inc. (ACLS) and Belden Inc. (BDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current ACLS Sharpe Ratio is -0.79, which is lower than the BDC Sharpe Ratio of 0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACLS and BDC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading data...

Dividends

ACLS vs. BDC - Dividend Comparison

ACLS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%.

TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ACLS
Axcelis Technologies, Inc.		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BDC
Belden Inc.		0.18%0.18%0.26%0.28%0.30%0.48%0.36%0.50%0.26%0.27%0.42%0.25%

Drawdowns

ACLS vs. BDC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACLS drawdown since its inception was -99.34%, which is greater than BDC's maximum drawdown of -85.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACLS and BDC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Loading data...

Volatility

ACLS vs. BDC - Volatility Comparison

Axcelis Technologies, Inc. (ACLS) has a higher volatility of 15.09% compared to Belden Inc. (BDC) at 9.13%. This indicates that ACLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading data...

Financials

ACLS vs. BDC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Axcelis Technologies, Inc. and Belden Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.

Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities

100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00M700.00M20212022202320242025
192.56M
624.86M
(ACLS) Total Revenue
(BDC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ACLS vs. BDC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Axcelis Technologies, Inc. and Belden Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual
34.0%36.0%38.0%40.0%42.0%44.0%46.0%20212022202320242025
46.1%
39.3%
(ACLS) Gross Margin
(BDC) Gross Margin
ACLS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Axcelis Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 88.77M and revenue of 192.56M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.1%.

BDC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Belden Inc. reported a gross profit of 245.84M and revenue of 624.86M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.3%.

ACLS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Axcelis Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 29.16M and revenue of 192.56M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.1%.

BDC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Belden Inc. reported an operating income of 72.63M and revenue of 624.86M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.6%.

ACLS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Axcelis Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 28.58M and revenue of 192.56M, resulting in a net margin of 14.8%.

BDC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Belden Inc. reported a net income of 51.94M and revenue of 624.86M, resulting in a net margin of 8.3%.