ACLS vs. BDC
ACLS (Axcelis Technologies, Inc.) and BDC (Belden Inc.) are both stocks. ACLS operates in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials (Technology), while BDC operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, ACLS returned 28.23%/yr vs 6.24%/yr for BDC. Their 0.45 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
ACLS vs. BDC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACLS achieves a 62.29% return, which is significantly higher than BDC's 6.52% return. Over the past 10 years, ACLS has outperformed BDC with an annualized return of 28.23%, while BDC has yielded a comparatively lower 6.24% annualized return.
ACLS
- 1D
- 4.13%
- 1M
- -9.77%
- 6M
- 48.04%
- YTD
- 62.29%
- 1Y
- 89.64%
- 3Y*
- -12.74%
- 5Y*
- 27.60%
- 10Y*
- 28.23%
- ALL TIME*
- 0.65%
BDC
- 1D
- 5.93%
- 1M
- 7.49%
- 6M
- 5.65%
- YTD
- 6.52%
- 1Y
- 5.63%
- 3Y*
- 9.16%
- 5Y*
- 20.70%
- 10Y*
- 6.24%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.48%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $50.40M | $65.01M | $96.95M | |
BDC Belden Inc. | $64.50M | $61.35M | $65.73M |
ACLS vs. BDC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACLS Axcelis Technologies, Inc. | 62.29% | 14.98% | -46.13% | 63.42% | 6.44% | 156.04% | 20.83% | 35.39% | -37.98% | 97.25% |
BDC Belden Inc. | 6.52% | 3.68% | 46.06% | 7.69% | 9.75% | 57.46% | -23.40% | 32.14% | -45.70% | 3.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACLS and BDC is 0.51, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.56 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2000 | 0.45 |
The correlation between ACLS and BDC shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (all time) to 0.56 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ACLS:
$4.01B
BDC:
$4.83B
ACLS:
$3.23
BDC:
$6.15
ACLS:
40.31
BDC:
20.16
ACLS:
2.37
BDC:
0.25
ACLS:
4.81
BDC:
1.72
ACLS:
3.87
BDC:
3.52
ACLS:
$845.44M
BDC:
$2.86B
ACLS:
$368.66M
BDC:
$1.04B
ACLS:
$129.11M
BDC:
$437.81M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACLS vs. BDC — Risk / Return Rank
ACLS
BDC
ACLS vs. BDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Axcelis Technologies, Inc. (ACLS) and Belden Inc. (BDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ACLS | BDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.04 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.24 | 0.01 | +2.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.55 | 0.03 | +6.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ACLS vs. BDC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACLS drawdown since its inception was -99.38%, which is greater than BDC's maximum drawdown of -85.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACLS and BDC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACLS | BDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.38% | -85.69% | -13.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.52% | -34.00% | -7.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -78.01% | -35.75% | -42.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -78.84% | -36.62% | -42.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -78.84% | -67.69% | -11.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.97% | -17.73% | -17.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -73.24% | -34.78% | -38.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.19% | 17.54% | -3.35% |
Volatility
ACLS vs. BDC - Volatility Comparison
Axcelis Technologies, Inc. (ACLS) has a higher volatility of 30.90% compared to Belden Inc. (BDC) at 18.94%. This indicates that ACLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACLS | BDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 30.90% | 18.94% | +11.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 57.97% | 34.12% | +23.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 66.73% | 40.56% | +26.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 56.98% | 37.61% | +19.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.57% | 40.37% | +14.20% |
Dividends
ACLS vs. BDC - Dividend Comparison
ACLS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACLS Axcelis Technologies, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BDC Belden Inc. | 0.16% | 0.17% | 0.18% | 0.26% | 0.28% | 0.30% | 0.48% | 0.36% | 0.48% | 0.26% | 0.27% | 0.42% |
Financials
ACLS vs. BDC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Axcelis Technologies, Inc. and Belden Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ACLS vs. BDC - Profitability Comparison
ACLS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Axcelis Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 80.58M and revenue of 198.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.5%.
BDC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Belden Inc. reported a gross profit of 293.62M and revenue of 750.16M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.1%.
ACLS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Axcelis Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 7.95M and revenue of 198.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.0%.
BDC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Belden Inc. reported an operating income of 99.26M and revenue of 750.16M, resulting in an operating margin of 13.2%.
ACLS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Axcelis Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 9.21M and revenue of 198.96M, resulting in a net margin of 4.6%.
BDC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Belden Inc. reported a net income of 68.54M and revenue of 750.16M, resulting in a net margin of 9.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ACLS and BDC have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACLS has higher volatility (30.90%) compared to BDC (18.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACLS dropped -99.38% vs BDC's -85.69%.
ACLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACLS and BDC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer