PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACLS vs. EME
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ACLS vs. EME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Axcelis Technologies, Inc. (ACLS) and EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACLS achieves a 98.15% return, which is significantly higher than EME's 37.38% return. Over the past 10 years, ACLS has underperformed EME with an annualized return of 30.54%, while EME has yielded a comparatively higher 33.77% annualized return.


ACLS

1D
0.26%
1M
12.21%
YTD
98.15%
6M
80.86%
1Y
168.58%
3Y*
-0.66%
5Y*
30.84%
10Y*
30.54%

EME

1D
1.48%
1M
-7.77%
YTD
37.38%
6M
37.33%
1Y
73.87%
3Y*
69.67%
5Y*
46.30%
10Y*
33.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACLS vs. EME - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ACLS
Axcelis Technologies, Inc.
98.15%14.98%-46.13%63.42%6.44%156.04%20.83%35.39%-37.98%97.25%
EME
EMCOR Group, Inc.
37.38%35.05%111.27%46.03%16.81%39.93%6.47%45.18%-26.68%16.09%

Correlation

The correlation between ACLS and EME is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2000

0.36

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ACLS:

$4.93B

EME:

$37.82B

EPS

ACLS:

$3.21

EME:

$29.65

PE Ratio

ACLS:

49.58

EME:

28.32

PEG Ratio

ACLS:

2.92

EME:

0.66

PS Ratio

ACLS:

5.92

EME:

2.13

PB Ratio

ACLS:

4.72

EME:

9.78

Total Revenue (TTM)

ACLS:

$845.44M

EME:

$17.75B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ACLS:

$368.66M

EME:

$3.47B

EBITDA (TTM)

ACLS:

$129.11M

EME:

$2.03B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACLS vs. EME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACLS
ACLS Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
ACLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACLS Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
ACLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACLS Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

EME
EME Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
EME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EME Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
EME Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
EME Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
EME Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACLS vs. EME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Axcelis Technologies, Inc. (ACLS) and EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ACLSEMEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.99

1.96

+1.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.39

2.37

+1.03

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.35

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.47

2.95

+3.52

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.03

7.46

+7.57

ACLS vs. EME - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACLS Sharpe Ratio is 2.99, which is higher than the EME Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACLS and EME, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ACLSEMEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.99

1.96

+1.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

1.40

-0.83

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

1.03

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.03

0.60

-0.57

Drawdowns

ACLS vs. EME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACLS drawdown since its inception was -99.34%, which is greater than EME's maximum drawdown of -70.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACLS and EME.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACLSEMEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.34%

-70.56%

-28.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.20%

-25.15%

-1.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-78.84%

-36.19%

-42.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-78.84%

-36.19%

-42.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-78.84%

-48.00%

-30.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.60%

-11.04%

-9.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-72.37%

-15.37%

-57.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.26%

9.94%

+1.32%

Volatility

ACLS vs. EME - Volatility Comparison

Axcelis Technologies, Inc. (ACLS) has a higher volatility of 25.94% compared to EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME) at 7.27%. This indicates that ACLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACLSEMEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.94%

7.27%

+18.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.82%

25.45%

+20.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.01%

37.97%

+19.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.63%

33.27%

+21.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

53.35%

32.94%

+20.41%

Dividends

ACLS vs. EME - Dividend Comparison

ACLS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACLS
Axcelis Technologies, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EME
EMCOR Group, Inc.
0.15%0.16%0.20%0.32%0.36%0.41%0.35%0.37%0.54%0.39%0.45%0.67%

Financials

ACLS vs. EME - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Axcelis Technologies, Inc. and EMCOR Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20222023202420252026
198.96M
4.63B
(ACLS) Total Revenue
(EME) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ACLS vs. EME - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Axcelis Technologies, Inc. and EMCOR Group, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
40.5%
18.7%
Portfolio components
ACLS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Axcelis Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 80.58M and revenue of 198.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.5%.

EME - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EMCOR Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 863.95M and revenue of 4.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.7%.

ACLS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Axcelis Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 7.95M and revenue of 198.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.0%.

EME - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EMCOR Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 403.85M and revenue of 4.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.7%.

ACLS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Axcelis Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 9.21M and revenue of 198.96M, resulting in a net margin of 4.6%.

EME - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EMCOR Group, Inc. reported a net income of 305.48M and revenue of 4.63B, resulting in a net margin of 6.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ACLS and EME have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ACLS has higher volatility (25.94%) compared to EME (7.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACLS dropped -99.34% vs EME's -70.56%.

ACLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACLS and EME

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer