ACLS vs. MU
ACLS (Axcelis Technologies, Inc.) and MU (Micron Technology, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — ACLS in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials, MU in Semiconductors. Over the past 10 years, ACLS returned 30.50%/yr vs 55.91%/yr for MU. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ACLS vs. MU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACLS achieves a 97.64% return, which is significantly lower than MU's 272.99% return. Over the past 10 years, ACLS has underperformed MU with an annualized return of 30.50%, while MU has yielded a comparatively higher 55.91% annualized return.
ACLS
- 1D
- 5.56%
- 1M
- 13.42%
- YTD
- 97.64%
- 6M
- 92.62%
- 1Y
- 181.23%
- 3Y*
- -0.74%
- 5Y*
- 31.70%
- 10Y*
- 30.50%
MU
- 1D
- 2.76%
- 1M
- 96.25%
- YTD
- 272.99%
- 6M
- 344.69%
- 1Y
- 986.42%
- 3Y*
- 149.77%
- 5Y*
- 67.79%
- 10Y*
- 55.91%
ACLS vs. MU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACLS Axcelis Technologies, Inc. | 97.64% | 14.98% | -46.13% | 63.42% | 6.44% | 156.04% | 20.83% | 35.39% | -37.98% | 97.25% |
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 272.99% | 240.24% | -0.96% | 71.93% | -45.93% | 24.21% | 39.79% | 69.49% | -22.84% | 87.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACLS and MU is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2000 | 0.46 |
The correlation between ACLS and MU shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.57 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ACLS:
$4.92B
MU:
$1.21T
ACLS:
$3.21
MU:
$21.26
ACLS:
49.45
MU:
50.06
ACLS:
2.91
MU:
0.19
ACLS:
5.90
MU:
20.77
ACLS:
4.71
MU:
16.74
ACLS:
$845.44M
MU:
$58.12B
ACLS:
$368.66M
MU:
$33.96B
ACLS:
$129.11M
MU:
$25.99B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACLS vs. MU — Risk / Return Rank
ACLS
MU
ACLS vs. MU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Axcelis Technologies, Inc. (ACLS) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACLS | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.20 | 15.10 | -11.90 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.53 | 7.40 | -3.87 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.95 | -0.50 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.94 | 33.99 | -27.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.16 | 134.69 | -118.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACLS | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.20 | 15.10 | -11.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 1.30 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 1.13 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.03 | 0.31 | -0.28 |
Drawdowns
ACLS vs. MU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACLS drawdown since its inception was -99.34%, roughly equal to the maximum MU drawdown of -98.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACLS and MU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACLS | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.34% | -98.25% | -1.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.20% | -30.28% | +4.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -78.84% | -57.63% | -21.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -78.84% | -57.63% | -21.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -78.84% | -57.63% | -21.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.80% | 0.00% | -20.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -72.38% | -58.21% | -14.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.25% | 7.64% | +3.61% |
Volatility
ACLS vs. MU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Axcelis Technologies, Inc. (ACLS) is 25.95%, while Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a volatility of 28.63%. This indicates that ACLS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACLS | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.95% | 28.63% | -2.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.86% | 53.49% | -7.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.01% | 66.06% | -9.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.64% | 52.32% | +2.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.36% | 49.66% | +3.70% |
Dividends
ACLS vs. MU - Dividend Comparison
ACLS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACLS Axcelis Technologies, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 0.05% | 0.16% | 0.55% | 0.54% | 0.89% | 0.21% |
Financials
ACLS vs. MU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Axcelis Technologies, Inc. and Micron Technology, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ACLS vs. MU - Profitability Comparison
ACLS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Axcelis Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 80.58M and revenue of 198.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.5%.
MU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 17.75B and revenue of 23.86B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.4%.
ACLS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Axcelis Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 7.95M and revenue of 198.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.0%.
MU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 16.13B and revenue of 23.86B, resulting in an operating margin of 67.6%.
ACLS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Axcelis Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 9.21M and revenue of 198.96M, resulting in a net margin of 4.6%.
MU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 13.79B and revenue of 23.86B, resulting in a net margin of 57.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ACLS and MU have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MU has higher volatility (28.63%) compared to ACLS (25.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACLS dropped -99.34% vs MU's -98.25%.
MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (15.10 vs 3.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACLS and MU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer