PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACLS vs. MU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ACLS vs. MU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Axcelis Technologies, Inc. (ACLS) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACLS achieves a 97.64% return, which is significantly lower than MU's 272.99% return. Over the past 10 years, ACLS has underperformed MU with an annualized return of 30.50%, while MU has yielded a comparatively higher 55.91% annualized return.


ACLS

1D
5.56%
1M
13.42%
YTD
97.64%
6M
92.62%
1Y
181.23%
3Y*
-0.74%
5Y*
31.70%
10Y*
30.50%

MU

1D
2.76%
1M
96.25%
YTD
272.99%
6M
344.69%
1Y
986.42%
3Y*
149.77%
5Y*
67.79%
10Y*
55.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACLS vs. MU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ACLS
Axcelis Technologies, Inc.
97.64%14.98%-46.13%63.42%6.44%156.04%20.83%35.39%-37.98%97.25%
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
272.99%240.24%-0.96%71.93%-45.93%24.21%39.79%69.49%-22.84%87.59%

Correlation

The correlation between ACLS and MU is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2000

0.46

The correlation between ACLS and MU shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.57 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ACLS:

$4.92B

MU:

$1.21T

EPS

ACLS:

$3.21

MU:

$21.26

PE Ratio

ACLS:

49.45

MU:

50.06

PEG Ratio

ACLS:

2.91

MU:

0.19

PS Ratio

ACLS:

5.90

MU:

20.77

PB Ratio

ACLS:

4.71

MU:

16.74

Total Revenue (TTM)

ACLS:

$845.44M

MU:

$58.12B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ACLS:

$368.66M

MU:

$33.96B

EBITDA (TTM)

ACLS:

$129.11M

MU:

$25.99B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACLS vs. MU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACLS
ACLS Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
ACLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACLS Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
ACLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACLS Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

MU
MU Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
MU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
MU Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
MU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MU Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACLS vs. MU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Axcelis Technologies, Inc. (ACLS) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ACLSMUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.20

15.10

-11.90

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.53

7.40

-3.87

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.95

-0.50

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.94

33.99

-27.06

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.16

134.69

-118.53

ACLS vs. MU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACLS Sharpe Ratio is 3.20, which is lower than the MU Sharpe Ratio of 15.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACLS and MU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ACLSMUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.20

15.10

-11.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

1.30

-0.72

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

1.13

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.03

0.31

-0.28

Drawdowns

ACLS vs. MU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACLS drawdown since its inception was -99.34%, roughly equal to the maximum MU drawdown of -98.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACLS and MU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACLSMUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.34%

-98.25%

-1.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.20%

-30.28%

+4.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-78.84%

-57.63%

-21.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-78.84%

-57.63%

-21.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-78.84%

-57.63%

-21.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.80%

0.00%

-20.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-72.38%

-58.21%

-14.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.25%

7.64%

+3.61%

Volatility

ACLS vs. MU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Axcelis Technologies, Inc. (ACLS) is 25.95%, while Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a volatility of 28.63%. This indicates that ACLS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACLSMUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.95%

28.63%

-2.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.86%

53.49%

-7.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.01%

66.06%

-9.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.64%

52.32%

+2.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

53.36%

49.66%

+3.70%

Dividends

ACLS vs. MU - Dividend Comparison

ACLS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
ACLS
Axcelis Technologies, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
0.05%0.16%0.55%0.54%0.89%0.21%

Financials

ACLS vs. MU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Axcelis Technologies, Inc. and Micron Technology, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
198.96M
23.86B
(ACLS) Total Revenue
(MU) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ACLS vs. MU - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Axcelis Technologies, Inc. and Micron Technology, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
40.5%
74.4%
Portfolio components
ACLS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Axcelis Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 80.58M and revenue of 198.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.5%.

MU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 17.75B and revenue of 23.86B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.4%.

ACLS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Axcelis Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 7.95M and revenue of 198.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.0%.

MU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 16.13B and revenue of 23.86B, resulting in an operating margin of 67.6%.

ACLS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Axcelis Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 9.21M and revenue of 198.96M, resulting in a net margin of 4.6%.

MU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 13.79B and revenue of 23.86B, resulting in a net margin of 57.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ACLS and MU have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MU has higher volatility (28.63%) compared to ACLS (25.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACLS dropped -99.34% vs MU's -98.25%.

MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (15.10 vs 3.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACLS and MU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer