DXLG vs. RMBS
DXLG (Destination XL Group, Inc.) and RMBS (Rambus Inc.) are both stocks. DXLG operates in Apparel Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while RMBS operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 10 years, DXLG returned -18.82%/yr vs 23.25%/yr for RMBS. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DXLG vs. RMBS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DXLG achieves a -32.38% return, which is significantly lower than RMBS's 12.21% return. Over the past 10 years, DXLG has underperformed RMBS with an annualized return of -18.82%, while RMBS has yielded a comparatively higher 23.25% annualized return.
DXLG
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -9.90%
- 6M
- -33.14%
- YTD
- -32.38%
- 1Y
- -48.18%
- 3Y*
- -49.12%
- 5Y*
- -31.08%
- 10Y*
- -18.82%
RMBS
- 1D
- -8.02%
- 1M
- -29.65%
- 6M
- 10.99%
- YTD
- 12.21%
- 1Y
- 60.96%
- 3Y*
- 18.59%
- 5Y*
- 35.01%
- 10Y*
- 23.25%
DXLG vs. RMBS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXLG Destination XL Group, Inc. | -32.38% | -65.82% | -38.86% | -34.81% | 18.84% | 2,018.61% | -79.05% | -41.01% | -1.36% | -48.24% |
RMBS Rambus Inc. | 12.21% | 73.84% | -22.55% | 90.54% | 21.88% | 68.33% | 26.75% | 79.60% | -46.06% | 3.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between DXLG and RMBS is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 1997 | 0.18 |
The correlation between DXLG and RMBS shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.28 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
DXLG:
$34.37M
RMBS:
$11.15B
DXLG:
-$0.73
RMBS:
$2.10
DXLG:
0.08
RMBS:
15.65
DXLG:
0.33
RMBS:
8.12
DXLG:
$432.82M
RMBS:
$721.16M
DXLG:
$171.83M
RMBS:
$555.52M
DXLG:
$741.00K
RMBS:
$298.07M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DXLG vs. RMBS — Risk / Return Rank
DXLG
RMBS
DXLG vs. RMBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Destination XL Group, Inc. (DXLG) and Rambus Inc. (RMBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DXLG | RMBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.19 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.67 | 1.55 | -2.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.03 | 3.68 | -4.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DXLG vs. RMBS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DXLG drawdown since its inception was -99.18%, roughly equal to the maximum RMBS drawdown of -97.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXLG and RMBS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DXLG | RMBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.18% | -97.16% | -2.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -72.12% | -39.58% | -32.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -91.51% | -48.83% | -42.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -95.02% | -48.83% | -46.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.29% | -52.95% | -43.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.51% | -39.58% | -57.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -78.22% | -74.76% | -3.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 47.02% | 16.63% | +30.39% |
Volatility
DXLG vs. RMBS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Destination XL Group, Inc. (DXLG) is 11.33%, while Rambus Inc. (RMBS) has a volatility of 26.16%. This indicates that DXLG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RMBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DXLG | RMBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.33% | 26.16% | -14.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 56.03% | 65.18% | -9.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 89.44% | 80.00% | +9.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 66.06% | 56.44% | +9.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 82.88% | 46.94% | +35.94% |
Dividends
DXLG vs. RMBS - Dividend Comparison
Neither DXLG nor RMBS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
DXLG vs. RMBS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Destination XL Group, Inc. and Rambus Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
DXLG vs. RMBS - Profitability Comparison
DXLG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Destination XL Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 45.75M and revenue of 103.34M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.3%.
RMBS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Rambus Inc. reported a gross profit of 143.66M and revenue of 180.19M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.7%.
DXLG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Destination XL Group, Inc. reported an operating income of -4.70M and revenue of 103.34M, resulting in an operating margin of -4.6%.
RMBS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Rambus Inc. reported an operating income of 61.76M and revenue of 180.19M, resulting in an operating margin of 34.3%.
DXLG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Destination XL Group, Inc. reported a net income of -5.94M and revenue of 103.34M, resulting in a net margin of -5.8%.
RMBS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Rambus Inc. reported a net income of 59.86M and revenue of 180.19M, resulting in a net margin of 33.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
DXLG and RMBS have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RMBS has higher volatility (26.16%) compared to DXLG (11.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DXLG dropped -99.18% vs RMBS's -97.16%.
RMBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.77 vs -0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DXLG and RMBS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer