PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DXLG vs. AEHR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DXLG vs. AEHR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Destination XL Group, Inc. (DXLG) and Aehr Test Systems (AEHR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DXLG achieves a -32.38% return, which is significantly lower than AEHR's 236.90% return. Over the past 10 years, DXLG has underperformed AEHR with an annualized return of -18.82%, while AEHR has yielded a comparatively higher 44.87% annualized return.


DXLG

1D
0.29%
1M
-9.90%
6M
-33.14%
YTD
-32.38%
1Y
-48.18%
3Y*
-49.12%
5Y*
-31.08%
10Y*
-18.82%

AEHR

1D
-6.31%
1M
-37.29%
6M
158.14%
YTD
236.90%
1Y
382.07%
3Y*
11.58%
5Y*
88.87%
10Y*
44.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DXLG vs. AEHR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DXLG
Destination XL Group, Inc.
-32.38%-65.82%-38.86%-34.81%18.84%2,018.61%-79.05%-41.01%-1.36%-48.24%
AEHR
Aehr Test Systems
236.90%21.41%-37.32%31.99%-16.87%855.73%26.50%41.84%-47.97%12.45%

Correlation

The correlation between DXLG and AEHR is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 1997

0.11

The correlation between DXLG and AEHR shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (all time) to 0.29 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DXLG:

$34.37M

AEHR:

$2.14B

EPS

DXLG:

-$0.73

AEHR:

-$0.38

PS Ratio

DXLG:

0.08

AEHR:

45.43

PB Ratio

DXLG:

0.33

AEHR:

15.04

Total Revenue (TTM)

DXLG:

$432.82M

AEHR:

$45.26M

Gross Profit (TTM)

DXLG:

$171.83M

AEHR:

$13.90M

EBITDA (TTM)

DXLG:

$741.00K

AEHR:

-$13.56M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DXLG vs. AEHR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DXLG
DXLG Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
DXLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DXLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
DXLG Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
DXLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
DXLG Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

AEHR
AEHR Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
AEHR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AEHR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
AEHR Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
AEHR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
AEHR Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DXLG vs. AEHR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Destination XL Group, Inc. (DXLG) and Aehr Test Systems (AEHR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DXLGAEHRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.38

-0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.67

9.04

-9.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.03

19.12

-20.15

DXLG vs. AEHR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DXLG Sharpe Ratio is -0.54, which is lower than the AEHR Sharpe Ratio of 3.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DXLG and AEHR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DXLG vs. AEHR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DXLG drawdown since its inception was -99.18%, roughly equal to the maximum AEHR drawdown of -97.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXLG and AEHR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DXLGAEHRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.18%

-97.98%

-1.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-72.12%

-42.58%

-29.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-91.51%

-87.37%

-4.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-95.02%

-87.37%

-7.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.29%

-87.37%

-8.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-97.51%

-41.65%

-55.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-78.22%

-79.44%

+1.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

47.02%

20.10%

+26.92%

Volatility

DXLG vs. AEHR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Destination XL Group, Inc. (DXLG) is 11.33%, while Aehr Test Systems (AEHR) has a volatility of 37.07%. This indicates that DXLG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AEHR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DXLGAEHRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.33%

37.07%

-25.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

56.03%

93.15%

-37.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

89.44%

121.48%

-32.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

66.06%

110.56%

-44.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

82.88%

94.40%

-11.52%

Dividends

DXLG vs. AEHR - Dividend Comparison

Neither DXLG nor AEHR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

DXLG vs. AEHR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Destination XL Group, Inc. and Aehr Test Systems. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M20222023202420252026
103.34M
10.31M
(DXLG) Total Revenue
(AEHR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

DXLG vs. AEHR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Destination XL Group, Inc. and Aehr Test Systems over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
44.3%
32.7%
Portfolio components
DXLG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Destination XL Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 45.75M and revenue of 103.34M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.3%.

AEHR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Aehr Test Systems reported a gross profit of 3.37M and revenue of 10.31M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.7%.

DXLG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Destination XL Group, Inc. reported an operating income of -4.70M and revenue of 103.34M, resulting in an operating margin of -4.6%.

AEHR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Aehr Test Systems reported an operating income of -4.23M and revenue of 10.31M, resulting in an operating margin of -41.0%.

DXLG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Destination XL Group, Inc. reported a net income of -5.94M and revenue of 103.34M, resulting in a net margin of -5.8%.

AEHR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Aehr Test Systems reported a net income of -3.20M and revenue of 10.31M, resulting in a net margin of -31.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DXLG and AEHR have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AEHR has higher volatility (37.07%) compared to DXLG (11.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DXLG dropped -99.18% vs AEHR's -97.98%.

AEHR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.18 vs -0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DXLG and AEHR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer