DXJ vs. IGF
DXJ (WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund) and IGF (iShares Global Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DXJ is a Japan Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Index, while IGF is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DXJ returned 18.72%/yr vs 8.67%/yr for IGF. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DXJ charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for IGF.
Performance
DXJ vs. IGF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DXJ achieves a 18.74% return, which is significantly higher than IGF's 9.68% return. Over the past 10 years, DXJ has outperformed IGF with an annualized return of 18.72%, while IGF has yielded a comparatively lower 8.67% annualized return.
DXJ
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- -0.37%
- YTD
- 18.74%
- 6M
- 19.84%
- 1Y
- 54.41%
- 3Y*
- 30.91%
- 5Y*
- 26.01%
- 10Y*
- 18.72%
IGF
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- -0.03%
- YTD
- 9.68%
- 6M
- 10.24%
- 1Y
- 17.04%
- 3Y*
- 16.28%
- 5Y*
- 10.22%
- 10Y*
- 8.67%
DXJ vs. IGF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXJ WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 18.74% | 32.78% | 29.83% | 42.04% | 5.96% | 17.99% | 3.94% | 18.94% | -19.78% | 22.81% |
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF | 9.68% | 21.31% | 14.81% | 6.14% | -1.26% | 11.57% | -6.50% | 25.82% | -9.95% | 19.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between DXJ and IGF is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2007 | 0.54 |
The correlation between DXJ and IGF shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (3 years) to 0.54 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DXJ vs. IGF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DXJ
IGF
Industrials
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Industrials
DXJ
IGF
Financial Services
DXJ
IGF
-
Consumer Cyclical
DXJ
IGF
-
Technology
DXJ
IGF
-
Basic Materials
DXJ
IGF
-
Healthcare
DXJ
IGF
-
Consumer Defensive
DXJ
IGF
-
Communication Services
DXJ
IGF
-
Energy
DXJ
IGF
Utilities
DXJ
IGF
Real Estate
DXJ
-
IGF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DXJ vs. IGF — Risk / Return Rank
DXJ
IGF
DXJ vs. IGF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DXJ | IGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.27 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.88 | 2.78 | +2.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.93 | 8.03 | +10.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DXJ vs. IGF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DXJ drawdown since its inception was -49.63%, smaller than the maximum IGF drawdown of -58.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXJ and IGF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DXJ | IGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.63% | -58.33% | +8.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.98% | -5.87% | -5.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.19% | -14.28% | -7.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.19% | -20.83% | -1.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.14% | -42.11% | +2.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.34% | -2.98% | +1.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.32% | -11.86% | -2.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.83% | 2.04% | +0.79% |
Volatility
DXJ vs. IGF - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ) has a higher volatility of 4.64% compared to iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) at 3.85%. This indicates that DXJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DXJ | IGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.64% | 3.85% | +0.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.56% | 8.73% | +4.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.73% | 10.58% | +7.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.02% | 14.00% | +5.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.17% | 16.83% | +3.34% |
DXJ vs. IGF - Expense Ratio Comparison
DXJ has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than IGF's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
DXJ vs. IGF - Dividend Comparison
DXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, less than IGF's 2.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXJ WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 1.09% | 1.29% | 3.48% | 3.44% | 3.02% | 2.64% | 2.53% | 2.47% | 2.92% | 2.30% | 1.98% | 5.95% |
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF | 2.94% | 3.23% | 3.21% | 3.36% | 2.67% | 2.42% | 2.33% | 3.27% | 3.52% | 2.95% | 2.98% | 3.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DXJ and IGF have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DXJ has higher volatility (4.64%) compared to IGF (3.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DXJ dropped -49.63% vs IGF's -58.33%.
On 10-year performance, DXJ leads with 18.72% vs 8.67% for IGF. On fees, IGF is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, IGF has been the lower-risk option at 3.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DXJ has performed better with a 18.72% return vs 8.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IGF is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for DXJ.
IGF has the higher dividend yield at 2.94%, compared with 1.09% for DXJ.
DXJ is categorized as Japan Equities, while IGF is Industrials Equities. DXJ tracks WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Index, while IGF tracks S&P Global Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for DXJ and 0.39% for IGF.
DXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DXJ and IGF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer