DXJ vs. DBJP
DXJ (WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund) and DBJP (Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF) are both Japan Equities funds - DXJ tracks the WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Index while DBJP tracks the MSCI Japan US Dollar Hedged Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DXJ returned 19.57%/yr vs 17.66%/yr for DBJP. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DXJ charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for DBJP.
Performance
DXJ vs. DBJP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DXJ achieves a 20.68% return, which is significantly lower than DBJP's 22.29% return. Over the past 10 years, DXJ has outperformed DBJP with an annualized return of 19.57%, while DBJP has yielded a comparatively lower 17.66% annualized return.
DXJ
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 1.56%
- YTD
- 20.68%
- 6M
- 21.33%
- 1Y
- 56.48%
- 3Y*
- 31.79%
- 5Y*
- 26.39%
- 10Y*
- 19.57%
DBJP
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- 3.23%
- YTD
- 22.29%
- 6M
- 22.61%
- 1Y
- 55.53%
- 3Y*
- 28.95%
- 5Y*
- 21.76%
- 10Y*
- 17.66%
DXJ vs. DBJP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXJ WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 20.68% | 32.78% | 29.83% | 42.04% | 5.96% | 17.99% | 3.94% | 18.94% | -19.78% | 22.81% |
DBJP Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF | 22.29% | 29.51% | 25.53% | 36.21% | -4.19% | 13.04% | 10.53% | 20.87% | -14.82% | 21.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between DXJ and DBJP is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2011 | 0.92 |
The correlation between DXJ and DBJP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
DXJ vs. DBJP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DXJ
DBJP
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Industrials
DXJ
DBJP
Financial Services
DXJ
DBJP
Consumer Cyclical
DXJ
DBJP
Technology
DXJ
DBJP
Basic Materials
DXJ
DBJP
Healthcare
DXJ
DBJP
Consumer Defensive
DXJ
DBJP
Communication Services
DXJ
DBJP
Energy
DXJ
DBJP
Utilities
DXJ
DBJP
Real Estate
DXJ
-
DBJP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DXJ vs. DBJP — Risk / Return Rank
DXJ
DBJP
DXJ vs. DBJP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DXJ | DBJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 1.50 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.17 | 5.37 | -0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.89 | 20.40 | -0.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DXJ vs. DBJP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DXJ drawdown since its inception was -49.63%, which is greater than DBJP's maximum drawdown of -31.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXJ and DBJP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DXJ | DBJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.63% | -31.30% | -18.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.98% | -10.39% | -0.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.19% | -21.50% | -0.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.19% | -21.50% | -0.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.14% | -31.30% | -7.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.21% | -3.33% | +0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.30% | -7.27% | -7.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.85% | 2.73% | +0.12% |
Volatility
DXJ vs. DBJP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ) is 6.21%, while Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) has a volatility of 7.87%. This indicates that DXJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBJP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DXJ | DBJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.21% | 7.87% | -1.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.93% | 15.43% | -1.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.14% | 19.92% | -1.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.07% | 19.18% | -0.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.99% | 19.30% | +0.69% |
DXJ vs. DBJP - Expense Ratio Comparison
DXJ has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than DBJP's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
DXJ vs. DBJP - Dividend Comparison
DXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than DBJP's 1.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBJP Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF | 1.24% | 2.81% | 2.80% | 5.21% | 0.80% | 2.30% | 2.53% | 2.56% | 3.87% | 2.07% | 1.13% | 5.95% |
DXJ WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.97% | 1.29% | 3.48% | 3.44% | 3.02% | 2.64% | 2.53% | 2.47% | 2.92% | 2.30% | 1.98% | 5.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, DXJ and DBJP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
DBJP has higher volatility (7.87%) compared to DXJ (6.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DXJ dropped -49.63% vs DBJP's -31.30%.
On 10-year performance, DXJ leads with 19.57% vs 17.66% for DBJP. On fees, DBJP is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, DXJ has been the lower-risk option at 6.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DXJ has performed better with a 19.57% return vs 17.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DBJP is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for DXJ.
DBJP has the higher dividend yield at 1.24%, compared with 0.97% for DXJ.
DXJ tracks WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Index, while DBJP tracks MSCI Japan US Dollar Hedged Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for DXJ and 0.45% for DBJP.
DXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.13 vs 2.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DXJ and DBJP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer