DXD vs. EQWL
DXD (ProShares UltraShort Dow30) and EQWL (Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DXD is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Industrial Average Index (-200%), while EQWL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P 100 Equal Weight Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DXD returned -24.44%/yr vs 14.46%/yr for EQWL. At a correlation of -0.85, they often move in opposite directions. DXD charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for EQWL.
Performance
DXD vs. EQWL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DXD achieves a -15.57% return, which is significantly lower than EQWL's 11.46% return. Over the past 10 years, DXD has underperformed EQWL with an annualized return of -24.44%, while EQWL has yielded a comparatively higher 14.46% annualized return.
DXD
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- -1.43%
- 6M
- -10.83%
- YTD
- -15.57%
- 1Y
- -26.79%
- 3Y*
- -21.47%
- 5Y*
- -15.76%
- 10Y*
- -24.44%
EQWL
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- 1.29%
- 6M
- 9.00%
- YTD
- 11.46%
- 1Y
- 20.27%
- 3Y*
- 18.86%
- 5Y*
- 12.31%
- 10Y*
- 14.46%
DXD vs. EQWL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXD ProShares UltraShort Dow30 | -15.57% | -21.11% | -16.07% | -18.77% | 7.09% | -35.18% | -44.57% | -35.33% | 3.07% | -38.64% |
EQWL Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF | 11.46% | 17.61% | 19.11% | 19.48% | -11.46% | 28.29% | 13.94% | 29.54% | -6.30% | 24.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between DXD and EQWL is -0.88, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2006 | -0.85 |
The correlation between DXD and EQWL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.93 to -0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
DXD vs. EQWL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DXD
EQWL
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
DXD
EQWL
Basic Materials
DXD
-
EQWL
Communication Services
DXD
-
EQWL
Consumer Cyclical
DXD
-
EQWL
Consumer Defensive
DXD
-
EQWL
Energy
DXD
-
EQWL
Healthcare
DXD
-
EQWL
Industrials
DXD
-
EQWL
Real Estate
DXD
-
EQWL
Technology
DXD
-
EQWL
Utilities
DXD
-
EQWL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DXD vs. EQWL — Risk / Return Rank
DXD
EQWL
DXD vs. EQWL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Dow30 (DXD) and Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF (EQWL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DXD | EQWL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 1.34 | -0.52 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.88 | 2.62 | -3.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.56 | 10.97 | -12.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DXD vs. EQWL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DXD drawdown since its inception was -99.72%, which is greater than EQWL's maximum drawdown of -49.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXD and EQWL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DXD | EQWL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.72% | -49.36% | -50.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.71% | -7.76% | -22.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -59.14% | -14.95% | -44.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.19% | -22.99% | -44.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -94.35% | -34.30% | -60.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.72% | -0.18% | -99.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.39% | -6.66% | -75.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.24% | 1.85% | +15.39% |
Volatility
DXD vs. EQWL - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort Dow30 (DXD) has a higher volatility of 4.67% compared to Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF (EQWL) at 2.59%. This indicates that DXD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQWL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DXD | EQWL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.67% | 2.59% | +2.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.46% | 8.32% | +11.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.59% | 10.60% | +13.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.57% | 15.03% | +14.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.85% | 16.70% | +18.15% |
DXD vs. EQWL - Expense Ratio Comparison
DXD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than EQWL's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
DXD vs. EQWL - Dividend Comparison
DXD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.03%, more than EQWL's 1.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXD ProShares UltraShort Dow30 | 4.03% | 4.25% | 5.91% | 3.87% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.31% | 1.76% | 1.15% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EQWL Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF | 1.56% | 1.67% | 1.86% | 1.97% | 2.12% | 1.65% | 2.01% | 2.04% | 2.23% | 1.27% | 2.01% | 2.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DXD and EQWL have a correlation of -0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DXD has higher volatility (4.67%) compared to EQWL (2.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DXD dropped -99.72% vs EQWL's -49.36%.
On 10-year performance, EQWL leads with 14.46% vs -24.44% for DXD. On fees, EQWL is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, EQWL has been the lower-risk option at 2.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EQWL has performed better with a 14.46% return vs -24.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EQWL is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for DXD.
DXD has the higher dividend yield at 4.03%, compared with 1.56% for EQWL.
DXD is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while EQWL is Large Cap Blend Equities. DXD tracks Dow Jones Industrial Average Index (-200%), while EQWL tracks S&P 100 Equal Weight Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for DXD and 0.25% for EQWL.
EQWL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs -1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DXD and EQWL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer