PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DWX vs. EFAV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DWX vs. EFAV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P International Dividend ETF (DWX) and iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DWX achieves a 6.54% return, which is significantly higher than EFAV's 4.53% return. Over the past 10 years, DWX has outperformed EFAV with an annualized return of 7.32%, while EFAV has yielded a comparatively lower 6.00% annualized return.


DWX

1D
-0.01%
1M
-0.12%
YTD
6.54%
6M
9.07%
1Y
15.35%
3Y*
15.08%
5Y*
7.37%
10Y*
7.32%

EFAV

1D
0.10%
1M
-1.48%
YTD
4.53%
6M
6.20%
1Y
9.18%
3Y*
13.13%
5Y*
6.49%
10Y*
6.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DWX vs. EFAV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DWX
SPDR S&P International Dividend ETF
6.54%31.62%2.56%14.74%-12.99%10.56%-5.10%20.26%-11.11%18.91%
EFAV
iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF
4.53%26.00%5.30%12.52%-15.11%7.20%-0.06%16.67%-5.74%22.24%

Correlation

The correlation between DWX and EFAV is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2011

0.85

The correlation between DWX and EFAV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

DWX vs. EFAV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DWX
EFAV

Financial Services

16.4%
19.9%

Communication Services

12.8%
9.7%

Consumer Defensive

12.6%
11.5%

Utilities

11.3%
9.1%

Real Estate

10.5%
2.9%

Energy

10.4%
8.2%

Industrials

10.2%
15.1%

Consumer Cyclical

6.2%
5.2%

Healthcare

4.5%
12.4%

Technology

2.8%
4.5%

Basic Materials

2.3%
1.6%

Financial Services

DWX
16.4%
EFAV
19.9%

Communication Services

DWX
12.8%
EFAV
9.7%

Consumer Defensive

DWX
12.6%
EFAV
11.5%

Utilities

DWX
11.3%
EFAV
9.1%

Real Estate

DWX
10.5%
EFAV
2.9%

Energy

DWX
10.4%
EFAV
8.2%

Industrials

DWX
10.2%
EFAV
15.1%

Consumer Cyclical

DWX
6.2%
EFAV
5.2%

Healthcare

DWX
4.5%
EFAV
12.4%

Technology

DWX
2.8%
EFAV
4.5%

Basic Materials

DWX
2.3%
EFAV
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DWX vs. EFAV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DWX
DWX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
DWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
DWX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
DWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
DWX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

EFAV
EFAV Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
EFAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFAV Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
EFAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFAV Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DWX vs. EFAV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P International Dividend ETF (DWX) and iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DWXEFAVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.43

0.89

+0.54

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.01

1.30

+0.71

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.16

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

1.59

+0.30

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.21

4.53

+1.69

DWX vs. EFAV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DWX Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is higher than the EFAV Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DWX and EFAV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DWXEFAVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43

0.89

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.55

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.46

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.54

-0.42

Drawdowns

DWX vs. EFAV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DWX drawdown since its inception was -66.86%, which is greater than EFAV's maximum drawdown of -27.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWX and EFAV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DWXEFAVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.86%

-27.56%

-39.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.59%

-6.46%

-2.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.65%

-8.75%

-1.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.96%

-27.46%

+0.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.05%

-27.56%

-8.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.85%

-4.96%

+1.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.13%

-4.77%

-9.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

2.27%

+0.35%

Volatility

DWX vs. EFAV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P International Dividend ETF (DWX) is 3.08%, while iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV) has a volatility of 3.27%. This indicates that DWX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EFAV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DWXEFAVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.08%

3.27%

-0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.69%

8.15%

+0.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.82%

10.37%

+0.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.21%

11.79%

+0.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.09%

13.21%

+1.88%

DWX vs. EFAV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DWX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than EFAV's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

DWX vs. EFAV - Dividend Comparison

DWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%, more than EFAV's 3.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DWX
SPDR S&P International Dividend ETF
4.19%4.44%4.31%4.12%4.68%3.89%3.84%4.40%5.06%3.85%5.25%5.81%
EFAV
iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF
3.06%3.20%3.24%3.08%2.53%2.47%1.33%4.19%3.34%2.45%3.94%2.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, DWX and EFAV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EFAV has higher volatility (3.27%) compared to DWX (3.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWX dropped -66.86% vs EFAV's -27.56%.

On 10-year performance, DWX leads with 7.32% vs 6.00% for EFAV. On fees, EFAV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, DWX has been the lower-risk option at 3.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DWX has performed better with a 7.32% return vs 6.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EFAV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for DWX.

DWX has the higher dividend yield at 4.19%, compared with 3.06% for EFAV.

DWX tracks S&P International Dividend Opportunities Index, while EFAV tracks MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for DWX and 0.20% for EFAV.

DWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DWX and EFAV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer