DWUS vs. THRV
DWUS (AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF) and THRV (Prospera Income ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DWUS charges 1.17%/yr vs 1.80%/yr for THRV.
Performance
DWUS vs. THRV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DWUS achieves a 15.72% return, which is significantly higher than THRV's 1.86% return.
DWUS
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 10.17%
- YTD
- 15.72%
- 6M
- 15.19%
- 1Y
- 24.82%
- 3Y*
- 21.40%
- 5Y*
- 12.00%
- 10Y*
- —
THRV
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 1.86%
- 6M
- 1.66%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DWUS vs. THRV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DWUS AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF | 15.72% | -0.17% |
THRV Prospera Income ETF | 1.86% | 0.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between DWUS and THRV is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | 0.59 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DWUS vs. THRV — Risk / Return Rank
DWUS
THRV
DWUS vs. THRV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF (DWUS) and Prospera Income ETF (THRV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DWUS | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.08 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.89 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DWUS | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 1.04 | -0.33 |
Drawdowns
DWUS vs. THRV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DWUS drawdown since its inception was -30.47%, which is greater than THRV's maximum drawdown of -1.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWUS and THRV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DWUS | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.47% | -1.50% | -28.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.98% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.45% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.51% | +0.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.86% | -0.44% | -6.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.16% | — | — |
Volatility
DWUS vs. THRV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DWUS | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.85% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.46% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.46% | 2.92% | +12.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.82% | 2.92% | +15.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.88% | 2.92% | +18.96% |
DWUS vs. THRV - Expense Ratio Comparison
DWUS has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is lower than THRV's 1.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
DWUS vs. THRV - Dividend Comparison
DWUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than THRV's 4.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWUS AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.18% | 0.29% | 0.89% | 0.35% | 0.08% |
THRV Prospera Income ETF | 4.71% | 1.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DWUS and THRV have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DWUS is cheaper at 1.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DWUS is cheaper with a 1.17% expense ratio, compared with 1.80% for THRV.
THRV has the higher dividend yield at 4.71%, compared with 0.03% for DWUS.
They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and Prospera Funds. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for DWUS and 1.80% for THRV.
Find the right allocation for DWUS and THRV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer