DWUS vs. MSOX
DWUS (AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF) and MSOX (Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DWUS is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while MSOX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, DWUS returned 21.40%/yr vs -63.28%/yr for MSOX. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DWUS charges 1.17%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for MSOX.
Performance
DWUS vs. MSOX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DWUS achieves a 15.72% return, which is significantly higher than MSOX's -31.70% return.
DWUS
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 10.17%
- YTD
- 15.72%
- 6M
- 15.19%
- 1Y
- 24.82%
- 3Y*
- 21.40%
- 5Y*
- 12.00%
- 10Y*
- —
MSOX
- 1D
- -11.82%
- 1M
- -8.66%
- YTD
- -31.70%
- 6M
- -19.05%
- 1Y
- 6.99%
- 3Y*
- -63.28%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DWUS vs. MSOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWUS AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF | 15.72% | 12.75% | 20.26% | 20.62% | -2.56% |
MSOX Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF | -31.70% | -51.20% | -87.32% | -39.26% | -79.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between DWUS and MSOX is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2022 | 0.21 |
DWUS vs. MSOX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DWUS
MSOX
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
Industrials
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
DWUS
MSOX
-
Communication Services
DWUS
MSOX
-
Consumer Cyclical
DWUS
MSOX
-
Healthcare
DWUS
MSOX
-
Consumer Defensive
DWUS
MSOX
-
Financial Services
DWUS
MSOX
Industrials
DWUS
MSOX
-
Energy
DWUS
MSOX
-
Utilities
DWUS
MSOX
-
Basic Materials
DWUS
MSOX
-
Real Estate
DWUS
MSOX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DWUS vs. MSOX — Risk / Return Rank
DWUS
MSOX
DWUS vs. MSOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF (DWUS) and Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF (MSOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DWUS | MSOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.21 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.08 | 0.08 | +2.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.89 | 0.13 | +7.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DWUS | MSOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.61 | 0.03 | +1.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | -0.45 | +1.16 |
Drawdowns
DWUS vs. MSOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DWUS drawdown since its inception was -30.47%, smaller than the maximum MSOX drawdown of -99.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWUS and MSOX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DWUS | MSOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.47% | -99.75% | +69.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.98% | -84.89% | +72.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.63% | -98.83% | +79.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.45% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -99.55% | +99.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.86% | -88.85% | +81.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.16% | 55.03% | -51.87% |
Volatility
DWUS vs. MSOX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF (DWUS) is 4.85%, while Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF (MSOX) has a volatility of 41.61%. This indicates that DWUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DWUS | MSOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.85% | 41.61% | -36.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.46% | 155.35% | -142.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.46% | 219.03% | -203.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.82% | 168.34% | -149.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.88% | 168.34% | -146.46% |
DWUS vs. MSOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DWUS has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than MSOX's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
DWUS vs. MSOX - Dividend Comparison
DWUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, while MSOX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWUS AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.18% | 0.29% | 0.89% | 0.35% | 0.08% |
MSOX Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DWUS and MSOX have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSOX has higher volatility (41.61%) compared to DWUS (4.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWUS dropped -30.47% vs MSOX's -99.75%.
On 3-year performance, DWUS leads with 21.40% vs -63.28% for MSOX. On fees, MSOX is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, DWUS has been the lower-risk option at 4.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DWUS has performed better with a 21.40% return vs -63.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MSOX is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for DWUS.
DWUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.03%, compared with 0.00% for MSOX.
DWUS is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while MSOX is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for DWUS and 0.95% for MSOX.
DWUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DWUS and MSOX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer