DWUS vs. EATZ

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

DWUS (AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF) and EATZ (AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DWUS is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while EATZ is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares. Both are actively managed. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DWUS charges 1.17%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for EATZ.

Performance

DWUS vs. EATZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF (DWUS) and AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

DWUS

• 1D: -3.80%
• 1M: 2.52%
• YTD: 13.47%
• 6M: 11.91%
• 1Y: 22.83%
• 3Y*: 19.90%
• 5Y*: 11.23%
• 10Y*: —

EATZ

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DWUS vs. EATZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DWUS AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF	13.47%	12.75%	20.26%	20.62%	-17.89%	12.66%
EATZ AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF	4.80%	-6.67%	23.21%	25.23%	-20.68%	-4.90%

Correlation

The correlation between DWUS and EATZ is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.37
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.53
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2021	0.56

The correlation between DWUS and EATZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.56 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DWUS vs. EATZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DWUS	EATZ
Technology	44.3%	-
Industrials	11.2%	4.9%
Financial Services	10.2%	-
Communication Services	8.9%	2.3%
Healthcare	7.6%	-
Consumer Cyclical	6.1%	78.2%
Consumer Defensive	3.7%	16.9%
Energy	3.3%	-
Real Estate	1.6%	-
Basic Materials	1.6%	-
Utilities	1.5%	-

Return for Risk

DWUS vs. EATZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DWUS

DWUS Risk / Return Rank: 39
DWUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
DWUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
DWUS Omega Ratio Rank: 38
DWUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
DWUS Martin Ratio Rank: 45

EATZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DWUS vs. EATZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF (DWUS) and AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DWUS	EATZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.28	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.76	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.91	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.03	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	DWUS	EATZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.47%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.98%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.63%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.45%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.80%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.82%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.26%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DWUS	EATZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.06%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.22%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.02%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.14%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.41%	—	—

DWUS vs. EATZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

DWUS has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than EATZ's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

DWUS vs. EATZ - Dividend Comparison

DWUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than EATZ's 0.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
DWUS AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF	0.03%	0.03%	0.18%	0.29%	0.89%	0.35%	0.08%
EATZ AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF	0.48%	0.50%	0.18%	0.49%	2.35%	0.15%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DWUS and EATZ in my portfolio?

DWUS and EATZ have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DWUS or EATZ?

On fees, EATZ is cheaper at 1.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DWUS or EATZ?

EATZ is cheaper with a 1.00% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for DWUS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DWUS or EATZ?

EATZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.48%, compared with 0.03% for DWUS.

What is the main difference between DWUS and EATZ?

DWUS is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while EATZ is Consumer Discretionary Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for DWUS and 1.00% for EATZ.