DWUS vs. EATZ

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF (DWUS) and AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ).

DWUS and EATZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DWUS is an actively managed fund by AdvisorShares. It was launched on Dec 26, 2019. EATZ is an actively managed fund by AdvisorShares. It was launched on Apr 20, 2021.

Performance

DWUS vs. EATZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF (DWUS) and AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

DWUS vs. EATZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DWUS AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF	-5.24%	12.75%	20.26%	20.62%	-17.89%	11.78%
EATZ AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF	-0.50%	-6.67%	23.21%	25.23%	-20.68%	-5.06%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DWUS achieves a -5.24% return, which is significantly lower than EATZ's -0.50% return.

DWUS

• 1D: 0.89%
• 1M: -5.46%
• YTD: -5.24%
• 6M: -5.54%
• 1Y: 9.65%
• 3Y*: 15.43%
• 5Y*: 8.34%
• 10Y*: —

EATZ

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: -5.76%
• YTD: -0.50%
• 6M: -5.62%
• 1Y: -5.79%
• 3Y*: 9.37%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DWUS vs. EATZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

DWUS has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than EATZ's 1.00% expense ratio.

DWUS

AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF

EATZ

AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF

Return for Risk

DWUS vs. EATZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DWUS

DWUS Risk / Return Rank: 28
DWUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
DWUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
DWUS Omega Ratio Rank: 26
DWUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
DWUS Martin Ratio Rank: 33

EATZ

EATZ Risk / Return Rank: 8
EATZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
EATZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
EATZ Omega Ratio Rank: 7
EATZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
EATZ Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DWUS vs. EATZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF (DWUS) and AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DWUS	EATZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.48	-0.27	+0.75
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.80	-0.26	+1.06
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	0.97	+0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.88	-0.20	+1.08
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.07	-0.39	+3.46
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DWUS vs. EATZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DWUS Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is higher than the EATZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DWUS and EATZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DWUS	EATZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48	-0.27	+0.75
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.57	0.07	+0.49

Correlation

The correlation between DWUS and EATZ is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

DWUS vs. EATZ - Dividend Comparison

DWUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than EATZ's 0.50% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
DWUS AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF	0.03%	0.03%	0.18%	0.29%	0.89%	0.35%	0.08%
EATZ AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF	0.50%	0.50%	0.18%	0.49%	2.35%	0.15%	0.00%

Drawdowns

DWUS vs. EATZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DWUS drawdown since its inception was -30.47%, smaller than the maximum EATZ drawdown of -34.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWUS and EATZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	DWUS	EATZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.47%	-34.40%	+3.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.98%	-23.21%	+11.23%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.45%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.43%	-17.93%	+9.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.00%	-13.39%	+6.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.42%	12.18%	-8.76%

Volatility

DWUS vs. EATZ - Volatility Comparison

AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF (DWUS) has a higher volatility of 5.90% compared to AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ) at 5.06%. This indicates that DWUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EATZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DWUS	EATZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.90%	5.06%	+0.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.75%	13.54%	-0.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.30%	21.22%	-0.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.79%	21.64%	-2.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.01%	21.64%	+0.37%