DWUS vs. EATZ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DWUS (AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF) and EATZ (AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DWUS is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while EATZ is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DWUS returned 12.00%/yr vs 2.20%/yr for EATZ. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DWUS charges 1.17%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for EATZ.

Performance

DWUS vs. EATZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF (DWUS) and AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DWUS achieves a 15.72% return, which is significantly higher than EATZ's 4.80% return.

DWUS

• 1D: 0.53%
• 1M: 10.17%
• YTD: 15.72%
• 6M: 15.19%
• 1Y: 24.82%
• 3Y*: 21.40%
• 5Y*: 12.00%
• 10Y*: —

EATZ

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 4.80%
• 6M: 3.18%
• 1Y: -6.88%
• 3Y*: 10.53%
• 5Y*: 2.20%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DWUS vs. EATZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DWUS AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF	15.72%	12.75%	20.26%	20.62%	-17.89%	11.78%
EATZ AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF	4.80%	-6.67%	23.21%	25.23%	-20.68%	-5.06%

Correlation

The correlation between DWUS and EATZ is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.54
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2021	0.57

The correlation between DWUS and EATZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.57 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DWUS vs. EATZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DWUS	EATZ
Technology	45.9%	-
Communication Services	13.4%	2.3%
Consumer Cyclical	10.8%	78.2%
Healthcare	6.4%	-
Consumer Defensive	6.3%	16.9%
Financial Services	5.8%	-
Industrials	5.3%	4.9%
Energy	2.3%	-
Utilities	1.6%	-
Basic Materials	1.4%	-
Real Estate	0.9%	-

Return for Risk

DWUS vs. EATZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DWUS

DWUS Risk / Return Rank: 45
DWUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
DWUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
DWUS Omega Ratio Rank: 45
DWUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
DWUS Martin Ratio Rank: 47

EATZ

EATZ Risk / Return Rank: 10
EATZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
EATZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
EATZ Omega Ratio Rank: 10
EATZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
EATZ Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DWUS vs. EATZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF (DWUS) and AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DWUS	EATZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.61	0.10	+1.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.23	0.28	+1.95
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.03	+0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.08	0.08	+2.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.89	0.14	+7.75
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DWUS vs. EATZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DWUS Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is higher than the EATZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DWUS and EATZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DWUS	EATZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.61	0.10	+1.52
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64	0.10	+0.54
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.72	0.12	+0.60

Drawdowns

DWUS vs. EATZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DWUS drawdown since its inception was -30.47%, smaller than the maximum EATZ drawdown of -34.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWUS and EATZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	DWUS	EATZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.47%	-34.40%	+3.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.98%	-23.21%	+11.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.63%	-23.21%	+3.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.45%	-33.34%	+6.89%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-13.56%	+13.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.86%	-13.40%	+6.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.16%	12.82%	-9.66%

Volatility

DWUS vs. EATZ - Volatility Comparison

AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF (DWUS) and AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ) have volatilities of 4.85% and 4.91%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DWUS	EATZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.85%	4.91%	-0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.46%	13.48%	-1.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.46%	18.81%	-3.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.82%	21.65%	-2.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.88%	21.60%	+0.28%

DWUS vs. EATZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

DWUS has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than EATZ's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

DWUS vs. EATZ - Dividend Comparison

DWUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than EATZ's 0.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
DWUS AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF	0.03%	0.03%	0.18%	0.29%	0.89%	0.35%	0.08%
EATZ AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF	0.48%	0.50%	0.18%	0.49%	2.35%	0.15%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DWUS and EATZ in my portfolio?

DWUS and EATZ have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DWUS or EATZ?

EATZ has higher volatility (4.91%) compared to DWUS (4.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWUS dropped -30.47% vs EATZ's -34.40%.

Which ETF is better, DWUS or EATZ?

On 5-year performance, DWUS leads with 12.00% vs 2.20% for EATZ. On fees, EATZ is cheaper at 1.00% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DWUS or EATZ?

Over the 5-year period, DWUS has performed better with a 12.00% return vs 2.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DWUS or EATZ?

EATZ is cheaper with a 1.00% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for DWUS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DWUS or EATZ?

EATZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.48%, compared with 0.03% for DWUS.

What is the main difference between DWUS and EATZ?

DWUS is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while EATZ is Consumer Discretionary Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for DWUS and 1.00% for EATZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DWUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.