PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DWMF vs. ESGN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DWMF vs. ESGN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree International Multifactor Fund (DWMF) and Columbia Sustainable International Equity Income ETF (ESGN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DWMF achieves a 2.60% return, which is significantly lower than ESGN's 8.09% return.


DWMF

1D
0.05%
1M
-1.25%
YTD
2.60%
6M
3.53%
1Y
7.67%
3Y*
13.33%
5Y*
8.42%
10Y*

ESGN

1D
0.54%
1M
0.78%
YTD
8.09%
6M
11.60%
1Y
25.97%
3Y*
20.05%
5Y*
12.09%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DWMF vs. ESGN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DWMF
WisdomTree International Multifactor Fund
2.60%24.42%10.22%10.78%-7.31%11.24%-1.18%16.10%-7.30%
ESGN
Columbia Sustainable International Equity Income ETF
8.09%39.85%6.02%20.88%-5.95%10.18%-0.52%15.83%-13.79%

Correlation

The correlation between DWMF and ESGN is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2018

0.80

The correlation between DWMF and ESGN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

DWMF vs. ESGN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DWMF
ESGN

Financial Services

20.0%
15.4%

Industrials

18.9%
15.8%

Consumer Defensive

11.5%
3.5%

Communication Services

9.5%
1.2%

Utilities

9.2%
9.3%

Healthcare

9.0%
3.9%

Real Estate

6.7%
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

5.5%
6.6%

Technology

4.0%
7.0%

Basic Materials

3.7%
1.9%

Energy

2.0%
13.0%

Financial Services

DWMF
20.0%
ESGN
15.4%

Industrials

DWMF
18.9%
ESGN
15.8%

Consumer Defensive

DWMF
11.5%
ESGN
3.5%

Communication Services

DWMF
9.5%
ESGN
1.2%

Utilities

DWMF
9.2%
ESGN
9.3%

Healthcare

DWMF
9.0%
ESGN
3.9%

Real Estate

DWMF
6.7%
ESGN
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

DWMF
5.5%
ESGN
6.6%

Technology

DWMF
4.0%
ESGN
7.0%

Basic Materials

DWMF
3.7%
ESGN
1.9%

Energy

DWMF
2.0%
ESGN
13.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DWMF vs. ESGN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DWMF
DWMF Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
DWMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DWMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
DWMF Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
DWMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
DWMF Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

ESGN
ESGN Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
ESGN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESGN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESGN Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
ESGN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESGN Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DWMF vs. ESGN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree International Multifactor Fund (DWMF) and Columbia Sustainable International Equity Income ETF (ESGN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DWMFESGNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.70

1.94

-1.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.05

2.69

-1.65

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.35

-0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.01

2.87

-1.86

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.00

10.64

-7.64

DWMF vs. ESGN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DWMF Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is lower than the ESGN Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DWMF and ESGN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DWMFESGNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

1.94

-1.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.79

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.61

-0.10

Drawdowns

DWMF vs. ESGN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DWMF drawdown since its inception was -29.72%, smaller than the maximum ESGN drawdown of -41.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWMF and ESGN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DWMFESGNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.72%

-41.71%

+11.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.74%

-9.56%

+0.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.74%

-14.38%

+5.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.00%

-24.51%

+7.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.46%

-2.81%

-3.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.90%

-7.06%

+3.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.94%

2.58%

+0.36%

Volatility

DWMF vs. ESGN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree International Multifactor Fund (DWMF) is 3.44%, while Columbia Sustainable International Equity Income ETF (ESGN) has a volatility of 4.05%. This indicates that DWMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ESGN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DWMFESGNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.44%

4.05%

-0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.72%

10.58%

-1.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.04%

13.48%

-2.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.23%

15.29%

-4.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.11%

16.31%

-2.20%

DWMF vs. ESGN - Expense Ratio Comparison

DWMF has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than ESGN's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

DWMF vs. ESGN - Dividend Comparison

DWMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, less than ESGN's 9.13% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DWMF
WisdomTree International Multifactor Fund
2.90%2.80%3.50%4.01%3.41%3.54%2.06%2.77%1.15%0.00%0.00%
ESGN
Columbia Sustainable International Equity Income ETF
9.13%9.76%3.11%3.27%3.57%3.43%2.64%3.34%7.25%4.63%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


DWMF and ESGN have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ESGN has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to DWMF (3.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWMF dropped -29.72% vs ESGN's -41.71%.

On 5-year performance, ESGN leads with 12.09% vs 8.42% for DWMF. On fees, DWMF is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, DWMF has been the lower-risk option at 3.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ESGN has performed better with a 12.09% return vs 8.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DWMF is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for ESGN.

ESGN has the higher dividend yield at 9.13%, compared with 2.90% for DWMF.

They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Ameriprise Financial. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for DWMF and 0.45% for ESGN.

ESGN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DWMF and ESGN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer