DWMF vs. DFIV

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

DWMF (WisdomTree International Multifactor Fund) and DFIV (Dimensional International Value ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, DWMF returned 13.90%/yr vs 23.26%/yr for DFIV. Their correlation of 0.84 means they have usually moved in the same direction. DWMF charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for DFIV.

Performance

DWMF vs. DFIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree International Multifactor Fund (DWMF) and Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DWMF achieves a 5.83% return, which is significantly lower than DFIV's 16.68% return.

DWMF

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.05%
• 6M: 2.42%
• YTD: 5.83%
• 1Y: 12.12%
• 3Y*: 13.90%
• 5Y*: 8.75%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.38%

DFIV

• 1D: -0.47%
• 1M: 4.37%
• 6M: 10.06%
• YTD: 16.68%
• 1Y: 37.44%
• 3Y*: 23.26%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 16.12%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DFIV Dimensional International Value ETF	$76.53M	$67.72M	$67.89M
DWMF WisdomTree International Multifactor Fund	$46.55K	$45.08K	$66.89K

DWMF vs. DFIV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DWMF WisdomTree International Multifactor Fund	5.83%	24.42%	10.22%	10.78%	-7.31%	0.06%
DFIV Dimensional International Value ETF	16.68%	45.36%	7.26%	17.75%	-3.70%	0.50%

Correlation

The correlation between DWMF and DFIV is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2021	0.84

The correlation between DWMF and DFIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

DWMF vs. DFIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DWMF	DFIV
Industrials	27.4%	9.8%
Financial Services	26.4%	34.3%
Technology	13.6%	3.1%
Basic Materials	9.8%	10.5%
Utilities	6.0%	2.3%
Energy	4.3%	14.1%
Healthcare	4.2%	5.4%
Consumer Cyclical	4.0%	9.7%
Real Estate	1.7%	1.7%
Communication Services	1.4%	4.0%
Consumer Defensive	1.2%	5.2%

Return for Risk

DWMF vs. DFIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DWMF

DWMF Risk / Return Rank: 39
DWMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
DWMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
DWMF Omega Ratio Rank: 39
DWMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
DWMF Martin Ratio Rank: 36

DFIV

DFIV Risk / Return Rank: 93
DFIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
DFIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
DFIV Omega Ratio Rank: 93
DFIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
DFIV Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DWMF vs. DFIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree International Multifactor Fund (DWMF) and Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DWMF	DFIV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.01	2.69	-1.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.51	3.65	-2.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.48	-0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.42	3.86	-2.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.64	14.96	-11.33

DWMF vs. DFIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DWMF Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is lower than the DFIV Sharpe Ratio of 2.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DWMF and DFIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DWMF vs. DFIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DWMF drawdown since its inception was -29.72%, which is greater than DFIV's maximum drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWMF and DFIV.

Drawdown Indicators

	DWMF	DFIV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.72%	-25.42%	-4.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.74%	-9.66%	+0.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.74%	-14.72%	+5.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.00%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.52%	-0.47%	-3.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.90%	-4.37%	+0.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.40%	2.49%	+0.91%

Volatility

DWMF vs. DFIV - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree International Multifactor Fund (DWMF) has a higher volatility of 4.90% compared to Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) at 3.89%. This indicates that DWMF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DWMF	DFIV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.90%	3.89%	+1.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.55%	11.59%	-1.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.27%	13.91%	-1.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.51%	16.55%	-5.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.16%	16.55%	-2.39%

DWMF vs. DFIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DWMF has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than DFIV's 0.27% expense ratio.

Dividends

DWMF vs. DFIV - Dividend Comparison

DWMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.10%, more than DFIV's 2.58% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
DFIV Dimensional International Value ETF	2.58%	2.92%	3.88%	3.93%	3.84%	2.30%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DWMF WisdomTree International Multifactor Fund	3.10%	2.80%	3.50%	4.01%	3.41%	3.54%	2.06%	2.77%	1.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DWMF and DFIV in my portfolio?

DWMF and DFIV have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DWMF or DFIV?

DWMF has higher volatility (4.90%) compared to DFIV (3.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWMF dropped -29.72% vs DFIV's -25.42%.

Which ETF is better, DWMF or DFIV?

On 3-year performance, DFIV leads with 23.26% vs 13.90% for DWMF. On fees, DFIV is cheaper at 0.27% per year. On volatility, DFIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DWMF or DFIV?

Over the 3-year period, DFIV has performed better with a 23.26% return vs 13.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DWMF or DFIV?

DFIV is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for DWMF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DWMF or DFIV?

DWMF has the higher dividend yield at 3.10%, compared with 2.58% for DFIV.

What is the main difference between DWMF and DFIV?

They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for DWMF and 0.27% for DFIV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DFIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.