DWAW vs. HDGE
DWAW (AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF) and HDGE (AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DWAW is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while HDGE is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DWAW returned 7.23%/yr vs -2.89%/yr for HDGE. At a correlation of -0.62, they often move in opposite directions. DWAW charges 1.24%/yr vs 3.36%/yr for HDGE.
Performance
DWAW vs. HDGE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DWAW achieves a 16.16% return, which is significantly higher than HDGE's 5.43% return.
DWAW
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 8.96%
- YTD
- 16.16%
- 6M
- 17.44%
- 1Y
- 27.21%
- 3Y*
- 19.57%
- 5Y*
- 7.23%
- 10Y*
- —
HDGE
- 1D
- 2.55%
- 1M
- -2.09%
- YTD
- 5.43%
- 6M
- 5.59%
- 1Y
- -0.65%
- 3Y*
- -5.06%
- 5Y*
- -2.89%
- 10Y*
- -14.77%
DWAW vs. HDGE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWAW AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF | 16.16% | 10.85% | 18.48% | 11.18% | -17.80% | 3.49% | 48.87% | -0.38% |
HDGE AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF | 5.43% | 1.50% | -8.01% | -26.98% | 16.59% | -18.61% | -43.47% | -0.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between DWAW and HDGE is -0.44, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2019 | -0.62 |
The correlation between DWAW and HDGE shifts across timeframes, from -0.64 (5 years) to -0.44 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DWAW vs. HDGE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DWAW
HDGE
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
-
Real Estate
Technology
DWAW
HDGE
Financial Services
DWAW
HDGE
Industrials
DWAW
HDGE
Consumer Cyclical
DWAW
HDGE
Healthcare
DWAW
HDGE
Communication Services
DWAW
HDGE
Basic Materials
DWAW
HDGE
Consumer Defensive
DWAW
HDGE
Energy
DWAW
HDGE
Utilities
DWAW
HDGE
-
Real Estate
DWAW
HDGE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DWAW vs. HDGE — Risk / Return Rank
DWAW
HDGE
DWAW vs. HDGE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF (DWAW) and AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DWAW | HDGE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.01 | +0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.36 | -0.05 | +2.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.57 | -0.11 | +9.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DWAW | HDGE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.76 | -0.04 | +1.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | -0.12 | +0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | -0.67 | +1.24 |
Drawdowns
DWAW vs. HDGE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DWAW drawdown since its inception was -31.55%, smaller than the maximum HDGE drawdown of -93.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWAW and HDGE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DWAW | HDGE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.55% | -93.88% | +62.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.58% | -12.26% | +0.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.91% | -29.46% | +6.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.43% | -42.97% | +14.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -83.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.51% | -93.08% | +92.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.98% | -70.11% | +59.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.85% | 6.16% | -3.31% |
Volatility
DWAW vs. HDGE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF (DWAW) is 5.42%, while AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE) has a volatility of 6.41%. This indicates that DWAW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HDGE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DWAW | HDGE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.42% | 6.41% | -0.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.97% | 12.81% | +0.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.57% | 18.33% | -2.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.13% | 24.18% | -5.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.41% | 23.56% | -1.15% |
DWAW vs. HDGE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DWAW has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is lower than HDGE's 3.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
DWAW vs. HDGE - Dividend Comparison
DWAW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, less than HDGE's 3.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWAW AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF | 0.66% | 0.76% | 0.00% | 1.70% | 0.53% | 1.45% | 0.16% | 0.00% |
HDGE AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF | 3.32% | 3.50% | 7.83% | 9.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DWAW and HDGE have a correlation of -0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HDGE has higher volatility (6.41%) compared to DWAW (5.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWAW dropped -31.55% vs HDGE's -93.88%.
On 5-year performance, DWAW leads with 7.23% vs -2.89% for HDGE. On fees, DWAW is cheaper at 1.24% per year. On volatility, DWAW has been the lower-risk option at 5.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DWAW has performed better with a 7.23% return vs -2.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DWAW is cheaper with a 1.24% expense ratio, compared with 3.36% for HDGE.
HDGE has the higher dividend yield at 3.32%, compared with 0.66% for DWAW.
DWAW is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while HDGE is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.24% for DWAW and 3.36% for HDGE.
DWAW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DWAW and HDGE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer