DWAW vs. BNO
DWAW (AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF) and BNO (United States Brent Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - DWAW is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while BNO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Crude Oil Brent ICE Near Term Futures. DWAW is actively managed, while BNO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DWAW returned 7.55%/yr vs 17.15%/yr for BNO. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DWAW charges 1.24%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for BNO.
Performance
DWAW vs. BNO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DWAW achieves a 14.00% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 50.21% return.
DWAW
- 1D
- -3.01%
- 1M
- 1.62%
- YTD
- 14.00%
- 6M
- 13.09%
- 1Y
- 24.71%
- 3Y*
- 18.75%
- 5Y*
- 7.55%
- 10Y*
- —
BNO
- 1D
- -1.35%
- 1M
- -22.65%
- YTD
- 50.21%
- 6M
- 47.81%
- 1Y
- 38.79%
- 3Y*
- 19.32%
- 5Y*
- 17.15%
- 10Y*
- 11.25%
DWAW vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWAW AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF | 14.00% | 10.85% | 18.48% | 11.18% | -17.80% | 3.49% | 48.87% | 24.93% |
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP | 50.21% | -5.44% | 9.67% | -3.43% | 35.25% | 62.34% | -38.23% | -1.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between DWAW and BNO is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2019 | 0.13 |
The correlation between DWAW and BNO shifts across timeframes, from -0.27 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DWAW vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank
DWAW
BNO
DWAW vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF (DWAW) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DWAW | BNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.19 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.14 | 1.33 | +0.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.53 | 4.21 | +4.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DWAW vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DWAW drawdown since its inception was -31.55%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWAW and BNO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DWAW | BNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.55% | -87.06% | +55.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.58% | -29.25% | +17.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.91% | -29.25% | +6.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.43% | -33.70% | +5.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.01% | -29.25% | +26.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.90% | -40.10% | +29.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | 9.28% | -6.38% |
Volatility
DWAW vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF (DWAW) is 7.22%, while United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) has a volatility of 10.92%. This indicates that DWAW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DWAW | BNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.22% | 10.92% | -3.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.32% | 37.29% | -22.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.78% | 41.67% | -24.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.30% | 35.65% | -16.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.57% | 36.68% | -12.11% |
DWAW vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison
DWAW has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than BNO's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
DWAW vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison
DWAW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DWAW AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF | 0.67% | 0.76% | 0.00% | 1.70% | 0.53% | 1.45% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DWAW and BNO have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BNO has higher volatility (10.92%) compared to DWAW (7.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWAW dropped -31.55% vs BNO's -87.06%.
On 5-year performance, BNO leads with 17.15% vs 7.55% for DWAW. On fees, BNO is cheaper at 1.00% per year. On volatility, DWAW has been the lower-risk option at 7.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BNO has performed better with a 17.15% return vs 7.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BNO is cheaper with a 1.00% expense ratio, compared with 1.24% for DWAW.
DWAW has the higher dividend yield at 0.67%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.
DWAW is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while BNO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and USCF Investments. Their fees differ too: 1.24% for DWAW and 1.00% for BNO.
DWAW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DWAW and BNO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer