DWAS vs. XSVM

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

DWAS (Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF) and XSVM (Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds from Invesco - DWAS tracks the Dorsey Wright SmallCap Technical Leaders Index while XSVM tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 High Momentum Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DWAS returned 12.36%/yr vs 13.04%/yr for XSVM. Their 0.76 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. DWAS charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.37%/yr for XSVM.

Performance

DWAS vs. XSVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DWAS achieves a 18.89% return, which is significantly lower than XSVM's 27.31% return. Over the past 10 years, DWAS has underperformed XSVM with an annualized return of 12.36%, while XSVM has yielded a comparatively higher 13.04% annualized return.

DWAS

• 1D: 2.36%
• 1M: -4.52%
• 6M: 13.09%
• YTD: 18.89%
• 1Y: 38.93%
• 3Y*: 13.18%
• 5Y*: 7.65%
• 10Y*: 12.36%
• ALL TIME*: 11.83%

XSVM

• 1D: 1.19%
• 1M: 3.59%
• 6M: 17.18%
• YTD: 27.31%
• 1Y: 43.31%
• 3Y*: 15.08%
• 5Y*: 10.26%
• 10Y*: 13.04%
• ALL TIME*: 9.38%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DWAS Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF	$1.30M	$3.37M	$2.26M
XSVM Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF	$2.64M	$2.37M	$2.08M

DWAS vs. XSVM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DWAS Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF	18.89%	6.09%	9.81%	16.88%	-18.51%	19.75%	32.32%	31.39%	-10.68%	20.84%
XSVM Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF	27.31%	7.47%	2.30%	20.20%	-13.63%	56.36%	5.08%	30.01%	-12.33%	3.62%

Correlation

The correlation between DWAS and XSVM is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.58
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.73
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.80
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2012	0.76

The correlation between DWAS and XSVM shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.80 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DWAS vs. XSVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DWAS	XSVM
Healthcare	28.5%	1.7%
Technology	20.9%	2.6%
Industrials	16.6%	5.3%
Financial Services	14.1%	45.1%
Energy	5.9%	5.7%
Consumer Cyclical	5.7%	18.1%
Basic Materials	3.2%	3.0%
Consumer Defensive	2.9%	4.1%
Real Estate	1.1%	9.7%
Communication Services	0.9%	2.6%
Utilities	0.3%	2.1%

Return for Risk

DWAS vs. XSVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DWAS

DWAS Risk / Return Rank: 65
DWAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
DWAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
DWAS Omega Ratio Rank: 55
DWAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
DWAS Martin Ratio Rank: 74

XSVM

XSVM Risk / Return Rank: 91
XSVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
XSVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
XSVM Omega Ratio Rank: 90
XSVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
XSVM Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DWAS vs. XSVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DWAS	XSVM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.52	2.45	-0.92
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.12	3.53	-1.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.43	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.59	4.32	-1.73
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.65	13.79	-4.15

DWAS vs. XSVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DWAS Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is lower than the XSVM Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DWAS and XSVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DWAS vs. XSVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DWAS drawdown since its inception was -46.16%, smaller than the maximum XSVM drawdown of -62.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWAS and XSVM.

Drawdown Indicators

	DWAS	XSVM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.16%	-62.57%	+16.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.10%	-10.08%	-5.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.83%	-26.21%	-7.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.83%	-26.21%	-7.62%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.16%	-49.02%	+2.86%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.64%	-0.28%	-9.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.24%	-11.48%	+1.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.05%	3.15%	+0.90%

Volatility

DWAS vs. XSVM - Volatility Comparison

Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS) has a higher volatility of 9.74% compared to Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM) at 4.25%. This indicates that DWAS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XSVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DWAS	XSVM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.74%	4.25%	+5.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.49%	11.78%	+8.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.73%	17.83%	+7.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.95%	22.34%	+3.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.85%	25.01%	+1.84%

DWAS vs. XSVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

DWAS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XSVM's 0.37% expense ratio.

Dividends

DWAS vs. XSVM - Dividend Comparison

DWAS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XSVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DWAS Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF	0.00%	0.07%	0.79%	1.42%	0.81%	0.16%	0.21%	0.13%	0.04%	0.20%	0.52%	0.19%
XSVM Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF	1.73%	2.29%	1.69%	1.31%	1.79%	1.23%	1.21%	1.22%	2.54%	1.90%	2.29%	2.68%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DWAS and XSVM in my portfolio?

DWAS and XSVM have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DWAS or XSVM?

DWAS has higher volatility (9.74%) compared to XSVM (4.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWAS dropped -46.16% vs XSVM's -62.57%.

Which ETF is better, DWAS or XSVM?

On 10-year performance, XSVM leads with 13.04% vs 12.36% for DWAS. On fees, XSVM is cheaper at 0.37% per year. On volatility, XSVM has been the lower-risk option at 4.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DWAS or XSVM?

Over the 10-year period, XSVM has performed better with a 13.04% return vs 12.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DWAS or XSVM?

XSVM is cheaper with a 0.37% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DWAS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DWAS or XSVM?

XSVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.73%, compared with 0.00% for DWAS.

What is the main difference between DWAS and XSVM?

DWAS tracks Dorsey Wright SmallCap Technical Leaders Index, while XSVM tracks S&P SmallCap 600 High Momentum Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DWAS and 0.37% for XSVM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XSVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.