PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DVYA vs. EWS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DVYA vs. EWS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF (DVYA) and iShares MSCI Singapore ETF (EWS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DVYA achieves a 13.35% return, which is significantly higher than EWS's 8.22% return. Over the past 10 years, DVYA has underperformed EWS with an annualized return of 7.30%, while EWS has yielded a comparatively higher 7.91% annualized return.


DVYA

1D
-0.86%
1M
0.51%
YTD
13.35%
6M
13.63%
1Y
39.49%
3Y*
21.73%
5Y*
9.88%
10Y*
7.30%

EWS

1D
-0.70%
1M
4.60%
YTD
8.22%
6M
8.37%
1Y
19.41%
3Y*
21.86%
5Y*
9.39%
10Y*
7.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DVYA vs. EWS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DVYA
iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF
13.35%30.22%6.05%13.75%-2.17%3.41%-9.61%14.70%-14.87%16.99%
EWS
iShares MSCI Singapore ETF
8.22%31.35%22.10%6.15%-9.80%5.47%-8.47%14.54%-11.34%34.78%

Correlation

The correlation between DVYA and EWS is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2012

0.67

The correlation between DVYA and EWS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

DVYA vs. EWS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DVYA
EWS

Financial Services

30.9%
52.2%

Basic Materials

16.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.9%
3.5%

Real Estate

10.6%
8.6%

Industrials

7.1%
18.1%

Consumer Defensive

5.2%
4.6%

Energy

5.0%

-

Communication Services

4.7%
4.2%

Utilities

4.5%
4.7%

Healthcare

3.5%

-

Technology

1.6%
4.0%

Financial Services

DVYA
30.9%
EWS
52.2%

Basic Materials

DVYA
16.1%
EWS

-

Consumer Cyclical

DVYA
10.9%
EWS
3.5%

Real Estate

DVYA
10.6%
EWS
8.6%

Industrials

DVYA
7.1%
EWS
18.1%

Consumer Defensive

DVYA
5.2%
EWS
4.6%

Energy

DVYA
5.0%
EWS

-

Communication Services

DVYA
4.7%
EWS
4.2%

Utilities

DVYA
4.5%
EWS
4.7%

Healthcare

DVYA
3.5%
EWS

-

Technology

DVYA
1.6%
EWS
4.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DVYA vs. EWS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DVYA
DVYA Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
DVYA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DVYA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
DVYA Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
DVYA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
DVYA Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

EWS
EWS Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
EWS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWS Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
EWS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWS Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DVYA vs. EWS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF (DVYA) and iShares MSCI Singapore ETF (EWS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DVYAEWSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.24

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.59

2.49

+2.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.66

6.08

+10.59

DVYA vs. EWS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DVYA Sharpe Ratio is 3.05, which is higher than the EWS Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DVYA and EWS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DVYAEWSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.05

1.32

+1.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.55

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

0.44

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.15

+0.16

Drawdowns

DVYA vs. EWS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DVYA drawdown since its inception was -45.61%, smaller than the maximum EWS drawdown of -75.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVYA and EWS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DVYAEWSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.61%

-75.00%

+29.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.64%

-7.82%

-0.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.15%

-16.34%

-2.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.37%

-29.06%

+3.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.61%

-40.84%

-4.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.11%

-0.70%

-2.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.06%

-21.88%

+11.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.38%

3.20%

-0.82%

Volatility

DVYA vs. EWS - Volatility Comparison

iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF (DVYA) has a higher volatility of 3.94% compared to iShares MSCI Singapore ETF (EWS) at 3.68%. This indicates that DVYA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EWS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DVYAEWSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.94%

3.68%

+0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.44%

11.45%

-1.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.00%

14.73%

-1.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.08%

17.25%

-2.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.55%

18.03%

-0.48%

DVYA vs. EWS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DVYA has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than EWS's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

DVYA vs. EWS - Dividend Comparison

DVYA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.33%, more than EWS's 3.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DVYA
iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF
4.33%4.71%5.97%6.48%7.29%5.81%3.66%5.52%6.24%4.74%4.79%5.33%
EWS
iShares MSCI Singapore ETF
3.79%4.10%4.28%6.50%2.56%6.00%2.68%4.70%4.21%3.46%3.96%4.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


DVYA and EWS have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DVYA has higher volatility (3.94%) compared to EWS (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DVYA dropped -45.61% vs EWS's -75.00%.

On 10-year performance, EWS leads with 7.91% vs 7.30% for DVYA. On fees, DVYA is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, EWS has been the lower-risk option at 3.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EWS has performed better with a 7.91% return vs 7.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DVYA is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EWS.

DVYA has the higher dividend yield at 4.33%, compared with 3.79% for EWS.

DVYA tracks Dow Jones Asia/Pacific Select Dividend 30 Index, while EWS tracks MSCI Singapore Index. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for DVYA and 0.50% for EWS.

DVYA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.05 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DVYA and EWS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer