PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DVXF vs. VFH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DVXF vs. VFH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WEBs Financial XLF Defined Volatility ETF (DVXF) and Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DVXF achieves a -12.22% return, which is significantly lower than VFH's -5.08% return.


DVXF

1D
0.01%
1M
-2.50%
YTD
-12.22%
6M
-5.70%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VFH

1D
0.06%
1M
-1.06%
YTD
-5.08%
6M
-1.24%
1Y
4.26%
3Y*
19.00%
5Y*
8.17%
10Y*
12.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DVXF vs. VFH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
DVXF
WEBs Financial XLF Defined Volatility ETF
-12.22%3.87%
VFH
Vanguard Financials ETF
-5.08%3.85%

Correlation

The correlation between DVXF and VFH is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025

0.99

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DVXF vs. VFH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DVXF

VFH
VFH Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
VFH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFH Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
VFH Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFH Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DVXF vs. VFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WEBs Financial XLF Defined Volatility ETF (DVXF) and Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DVXF vs. VFH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DVXFVFHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.37

0.24

-0.62

Drawdowns

DVXF vs. VFH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DVXF drawdown since its inception was -26.68%, smaller than the maximum VFH drawdown of -78.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVXF and VFH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DVXFVFHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.68%

-78.61%

+51.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.05%

-7.96%

-9.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.27%

-18.54%

+9.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.52%

Volatility

DVXF vs. VFH - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DVXFVFHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.49%

14.72%

+12.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.49%

19.30%

+8.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.49%

22.54%

+4.95%

DVXF vs. VFH - Expense Ratio Comparison

DVXF has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than VFH's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

DVXF vs. VFH - Dividend Comparison

DVXF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VFH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DVXF
WEBs Financial XLF Defined Volatility ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VFH
Vanguard Financials ETF
1.54%1.55%1.75%2.08%2.31%1.87%2.21%2.17%2.30%1.53%1.63%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, DVXF and VFH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, VFH is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VFH is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for DVXF.

VFH has the higher dividend yield at 1.54%, compared with 0.00% for DVXF.

DVXF tracks Syntax Defined Volatility XLF Index, while VFH tracks MSCI US Investable Market Financials 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: WEBs and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for DVXF and 0.10% for VFH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DVXF and VFH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer