DVXF vs. VFH
DVXF (WEBs Financial XLF Defined Volatility ETF) and VFH (Vanguard Financials ETF) are both Financials Equities funds - DVXF tracks the Syntax Defined Volatility XLF Index while VFH tracks the MSCI US Investable Market Financials 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. DVXF charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for VFH.
Performance
DVXF vs. VFH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DVXF achieves a -12.22% return, which is significantly lower than VFH's -5.08% return.
DVXF
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- -2.50%
- YTD
- -12.22%
- 6M
- -5.70%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VFH
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -1.06%
- YTD
- -5.08%
- 6M
- -1.24%
- 1Y
- 4.26%
- 3Y*
- 19.00%
- 5Y*
- 8.17%
- 10Y*
- 12.35%
DVXF vs. VFH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DVXF WEBs Financial XLF Defined Volatility ETF | -12.22% | 3.87% |
VFH Vanguard Financials ETF | -5.08% | 3.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between DVXF and VFH is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025 | 0.99 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DVXF vs. VFH — Risk / Return Rank
DVXF
VFH
DVXF vs. VFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WEBs Financial XLF Defined Volatility ETF (DVXF) and Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DVXF | VFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.37 | 0.24 | -0.62 |
Drawdowns
DVXF vs. VFH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DVXF drawdown since its inception was -26.68%, smaller than the maximum VFH drawdown of -78.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVXF and VFH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DVXF | VFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.68% | -78.61% | +51.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.05% | -7.96% | -9.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.27% | -18.54% | +9.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.52% | — |
Volatility
DVXF vs. VFH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DVXF | VFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.12% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.03% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.49% | 14.72% | +12.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.49% | 19.30% | +8.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.49% | 22.54% | +4.95% |
DVXF vs. VFH - Expense Ratio Comparison
DVXF has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than VFH's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
DVXF vs. VFH - Dividend Comparison
DVXF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VFH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DVXF WEBs Financial XLF Defined Volatility ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VFH Vanguard Financials ETF | 1.54% | 1.55% | 1.75% | 2.08% | 2.31% | 1.87% | 2.21% | 2.17% | 2.30% | 1.53% | 1.63% | 2.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, DVXF and VFH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, VFH is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VFH is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for DVXF.
VFH has the higher dividend yield at 1.54%, compared with 0.00% for DVXF.
DVXF tracks Syntax Defined Volatility XLF Index, while VFH tracks MSCI US Investable Market Financials 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: WEBs and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for DVXF and 0.10% for VFH.
Find the right allocation for DVXF and VFH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer