PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DVXF vs. DVXV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DVXF vs. DVXV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WEBs Financial XLF Defined Volatility ETF (DVXF) and WEBs Health Care XLV Defined Volatility ETF (DVXV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DVXF achieves a 6.49% return, which is significantly higher than DVXV's 4.89% return.


DVXF

1D
-0.15%
1M
4.19%
6M
12.72%
YTD
6.49%
1Y
18.04%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.20%

DVXV

1D
-0.50%
1M
-1.06%
6M
5.03%
YTD
4.89%
1Y
33.47%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
26.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$28.66K$29.28K$15.70K
$1.42K$1.10K$2.54K

DVXF vs. DVXV - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DVXF and DVXV is 0.41, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025

0.42

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DVXF vs. DVXV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DVXF
DVXF Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
DVXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DVXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
DVXF Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
DVXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
DVXF Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

DVXV
DVXV Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
DVXV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DVXV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
DVXV Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
DVXV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
DVXV Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DVXF vs. DVXV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WEBs Financial XLF Defined Volatility ETF (DVXF) and WEBs Health Care XLV Defined Volatility ETF (DVXV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DVXFDVXVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.28

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.52

2.41

-1.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.22

5.60

-4.38

DVXF vs. DVXV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DVXF Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is lower than the DVXV Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DVXF and DVXV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DVXF vs. DVXV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DVXF drawdown since its inception was -26.68%, which is greater than DVXV's maximum drawdown of -14.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVXF and DVXV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DVXFDVXVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.68%

-14.36%

-12.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.68%

-14.36%

-12.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.17%

-2.61%

+0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.83%

-4.58%

-4.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.35%

6.16%

+5.19%

Volatility

DVXF vs. DVXV - Volatility Comparison

WEBs Financial XLF Defined Volatility ETF (DVXF) has a higher volatility of 7.81% compared to WEBs Health Care XLV Defined Volatility ETF (DVXV) at 5.81%. This indicates that DVXF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DVXV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DVXFDVXVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.81%

5.81%

+2.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.37%

15.13%

+5.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.99%

21.61%

+6.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.81%

21.42%

+6.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.81%

21.42%

+6.39%

DVXF vs. DVXV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DVXF and DVXV have an expense ratio of 0.89%.


Dividends

DVXF vs. DVXV - Dividend Comparison

Neither DVXF nor DVXV has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


DVXF and DVXV have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DVXF has higher volatility (7.81%) compared to DVXV (5.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DVXF dropped -26.68% vs DVXV's -14.36%.

On 1-year performance, DVXV leads with 33.47% vs 18.04% for DVXF. Both ETFs have the same 0.89% expense ratio. On volatility, DVXV has been the lower-risk option at 5.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DVXV has performed better with a 33.47% return vs 18.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DVXF and DVXV have the same expense ratio: 0.89% per year.

DVXF and DVXV have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

DVXF is categorized as Financials Equities, while DVXV is Health & Biotech Equities. DVXF tracks Syntax Defined Volatility XLF Index, while DVXV tracks Syntax Defined Volatility XLV Index.

DVXV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DVXF and DVXV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer