DVXF vs. KBWB

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

DVXF (WEBs Financial XLF Defined Volatility ETF) and KBWB (Invesco KBW Bank ETF) are both Financials Equities funds - DVXF tracks the Syntax Defined Volatility XLF Index while KBWB tracks the KBW Nasdaq Bank Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DVXF charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for KBWB.

Performance

DVXF vs. KBWB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WEBs Financial XLF Defined Volatility ETF (DVXF) and Invesco KBW Bank ETF (KBWB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DVXF achieves a -3.59% return, which is significantly lower than KBWB's 12.95% return.

DVXF

• 1D: 0.75%
• 1M: 7.59%
• YTD: -3.59%
• 6M: -6.04%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KBWB

• 1D: 0.68%
• 1M: 9.33%
• YTD: 12.95%
• 6M: 10.99%
• 1Y: 40.49%
• 3Y*: 37.07%
• 5Y*: 10.98%
• 10Y*: 14.07%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DVXF vs. KBWB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DVXF WEBs Financial XLF Defined Volatility ETF	-3.59%	5.63%
KBWB Invesco KBW Bank ETF	12.95%	15.11%

Correlation

The correlation between DVXF and KBWB is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025	0.86

Return for Risk

DVXF vs. KBWB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DVXF

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

KBWB

KBWB Risk / Return Rank: 56
KBWB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
KBWB Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
KBWB Omega Ratio Rank: 59
KBWB Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
KBWB Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DVXF vs. KBWB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WEBs Financial XLF Defined Volatility ETF (DVXF) and Invesco KBW Bank ETF (KBWB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DVXF	KBWB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.01	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.62	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.35	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.48	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	7.81	—

Drawdowns

DVXF vs. KBWB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DVXF drawdown since its inception was -26.68%, smaller than the maximum KBWB drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVXF and KBWB.

Drawdown Indicators

	DVXF	KBWB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.68%	-50.27%	+23.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-16.38%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-25.43%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-49.31%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-50.27%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.91%	0.00%	-8.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.43%	-11.70%	+2.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.20%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DVXF	KBWB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.65%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	15.89%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.84%	20.26%	+7.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.84%	26.55%	+1.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.84%	29.12%	-1.28%

DVXF vs. KBWB - Expense Ratio Comparison

DVXF has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than KBWB's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

DVXF vs. KBWB - Dividend Comparison

DVXF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KBWB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DVXF WEBs Financial XLF Defined Volatility ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
KBWB Invesco KBW Bank ETF	1.97%	2.04%	2.46%	3.20%	3.05%	2.13%	2.62%	2.38%	2.54%	1.35%	1.53%	1.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DVXF and KBWB in my portfolio?

DVXF and KBWB have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DVXF or KBWB?

On fees, KBWB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DVXF or KBWB?

KBWB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for DVXF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DVXF or KBWB?

KBWB has the higher dividend yield at 1.97%, compared with 0.00% for DVXF.

What is the main difference between DVXF and KBWB?

DVXF tracks Syntax Defined Volatility XLF Index, while KBWB tracks KBW Nasdaq Bank Index. They also come from different issuers: WEBs and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for DVXF and 0.35% for KBWB.