DVXB vs. FXZ
DVXB (WEBs Materials XLB Defined Volatility ETF) and FXZ (First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund) are both Materials funds - DVXB tracks the Syntax Defined Volatility XLB Index while FXZ tracks the StrataQuant Materials Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DVXB charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.67%/yr for FXZ.
Performance
DVXB vs. FXZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DVXB achieves a 20.01% return, which is significantly lower than FXZ's 29.58% return.
DVXB
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 1.55%
- YTD
- 20.01%
- 6M
- 24.08%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FXZ
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 3.76%
- YTD
- 29.58%
- 6M
- 33.83%
- 1Y
- 52.87%
- 3Y*
- 13.19%
- 5Y*
- 7.83%
- 10Y*
- 11.59%
DVXB vs. FXZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DVXB WEBs Materials XLB Defined Volatility ETF | 20.01% | -6.27% |
FXZ First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund | 29.58% | 6.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between DVXB and FXZ is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025 | 0.92 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DVXB vs. FXZ — Risk / Return Rank
DVXB
FXZ
DVXB vs. FXZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WEBs Materials XLB Defined Volatility ETF (DVXB) and First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund (FXZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DVXB | FXZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.33 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.35 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
DVXB vs. FXZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DVXB drawdown since its inception was -19.77%, smaller than the maximum FXZ drawdown of -65.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVXB and FXZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DVXB | FXZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.77% | -65.46% | +45.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -33.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -49.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.08% | -0.44% | -8.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.93% | -11.35% | +4.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.38% | — |
Volatility
DVXB vs. FXZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DVXB | FXZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.85% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.38% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.44% | 21.84% | +8.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.44% | 24.13% | +6.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.44% | 24.87% | +5.57% |
DVXB vs. FXZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
DVXB has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than FXZ's 0.67% expense ratio.
Dividends
DVXB vs. FXZ - Dividend Comparison
DVXB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FXZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DVXB WEBs Materials XLB Defined Volatility ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FXZ First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund | 1.38% | 1.74% | 1.81% | 1.97% | 1.56% | 1.11% | 1.51% | 1.58% | 1.38% | 1.01% | 1.19% | 1.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, DVXB and FXZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, FXZ is cheaper at 0.67% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FXZ is cheaper with a 0.67% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for DVXB.
FXZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.38%, compared with 0.00% for DVXB.
DVXB tracks Syntax Defined Volatility XLB Index, while FXZ tracks StrataQuant Materials Index. They also come from different issuers: WEBs and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for DVXB and 0.67% for FXZ.
Find the right allocation for DVXB and FXZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer