DVXB vs. DVXK

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

DVXB (WEBs Materials XLB Defined Volatility ETF) and DVXK (WEBs Technology XLK Defined Volatility ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DVXB is a Materials fund tracking the Syntax Defined Volatility XLB Index, while DVXK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Syntax Defined Volatility XLK Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, DVXB returned 20.35% vs 48.91% for DVXK. Their 0.31 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 0.89% expense ratio.

Performance

DVXB vs. DVXK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WEBs Materials XLB Defined Volatility ETF (DVXB) and WEBs Technology XLK Defined Volatility ETF (DVXK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DVXB achieves a 15.12% return, which is significantly lower than DVXK's 25.56% return.

DVXB

• 1D: -3.82%
• 1M: -4.08%
• 6M: -0.84%
• YTD: 15.12%
• 1Y: 20.35%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.74%

DVXK

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: -2.72%
• 6M: 26.10%
• YTD: 25.56%
• 1Y: 48.91%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 44.89%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DVXB WEBs Materials XLB Defined Volatility ETF	$1.05K	$1.06K	$4.38K
DVXK WEBs Technology XLK Defined Volatility ETF	$166.11K	$93.54K	$249.13K

DVXB vs. DVXK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DVXB WEBs Materials XLB Defined Volatility ETF	15.12%	-6.27%
DVXK WEBs Technology XLK Defined Volatility ETF	25.56%	16.30%

Correlation

The correlation between DVXB and DVXK is 0.32, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025	0.31

Return for Risk

DVXB vs. DVXK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DVXB

DVXB Risk / Return Rank: 27
DVXB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
DVXB Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
DVXB Omega Ratio Rank: 26
DVXB Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
DVXB Martin Ratio Rank: 26

DVXK

DVXK Risk / Return Rank: 49
DVXK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
DVXK Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
DVXK Omega Ratio Rank: 48
DVXK Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
DVXK Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DVXB vs. DVXK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WEBs Materials XLB Defined Volatility ETF (DVXB) and WEBs Technology XLK Defined Volatility ETF (DVXK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DVXB	DVXK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.59	1.30	-0.71
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.02	1.78	-0.76
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.22	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.91	1.79	-0.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.08	4.71	-2.63

DVXB vs. DVXK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DVXB Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is lower than the DVXK Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DVXB and DVXK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DVXB vs. DVXK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DVXB drawdown since its inception was -19.77%, smaller than the maximum DVXK drawdown of -24.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVXB and DVXK.

Drawdown Indicators

	DVXB	DVXK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.77%	-24.08%	+4.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.77%	-24.08%	+4.31%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.78%	-13.17%	+0.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.54%	-7.26%	-0.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.63%	9.15%	-0.52%

Volatility

DVXB vs. DVXK - Volatility Comparison

WEBs Materials XLB Defined Volatility ETF (DVXB) and WEBs Technology XLK Defined Volatility ETF (DVXK) have volatilities of 8.95% and 8.64%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DVXB	DVXK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.95%	8.64%	+0.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.87%	24.83%	-1.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.49%	33.23%	-2.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.60%	32.88%	-2.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.60%	32.88%	-2.28%

DVXB vs. DVXK - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DVXB and DVXK have an expense ratio of 0.89%.

Dividends

DVXB vs. DVXK - Dividend Comparison

DVXB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DVXK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%.

Position	TTM	2025
DVXB WEBs Materials XLB Defined Volatility ETF	0.00%	0.00%
DVXK WEBs Technology XLK Defined Volatility ETF	2.64%	3.32%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DVXB and DVXK in my portfolio?

DVXB and DVXK have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DVXB or DVXK?

DVXB has higher volatility (8.95%) compared to DVXK (8.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DVXB dropped -19.77% vs DVXK's -24.08%.

Which ETF is better, DVXB or DVXK?

On 1-year performance, DVXK leads with 48.91% vs 20.35% for DVXB. Both ETFs have the same 0.89% expense ratio. On volatility, DVXK has been the lower-risk option at 8.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DVXB or DVXK?

Over the 1-year period, DVXK has performed better with a 48.91% return vs 20.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DVXB or DVXK?

DVXB and DVXK have the same expense ratio: 0.89% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DVXB or DVXK?

DVXK has the higher dividend yield at 2.64%, compared with 0.00% for DVXB.

What is the main difference between DVXB and DVXK?

DVXB is categorized as Materials, while DVXK is Technology Equities. DVXB tracks Syntax Defined Volatility XLB Index, while DVXK tracks Syntax Defined Volatility XLK Index.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DVXK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.