PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DVOL vs. FDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DVOL vs. FDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF (DVOL) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DVOL achieves a 1.20% return, which is significantly lower than FDL's 13.62% return.


DVOL

1D
0.45%
1M
-4.01%
YTD
1.20%
6M
2.04%
1Y
0.20%
3Y*
12.63%
5Y*
6.89%
10Y*

FDL

1D
0.42%
1M
-0.81%
YTD
13.62%
6M
16.42%
1Y
24.43%
3Y*
19.07%
5Y*
12.64%
10Y*
11.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DVOL vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DVOL
First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF
1.20%4.30%24.84%5.39%-16.10%30.08%11.15%26.10%-9.89%
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
13.62%14.79%17.98%2.94%6.66%26.10%-4.30%24.41%-6.06%

Correlation

The correlation between DVOL and FDL is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2018

0.56

The correlation between DVOL and FDL shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.63 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DVOL vs. FDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DVOL
FDL

Financial Services

18.8%
15.1%

Industrials

16.6%
3.8%

Energy

14.0%
27.3%

Real Estate

12.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%
3.8%

Consumer Defensive

8.2%
14.7%

Basic Materials

6.0%
0.3%

Technology

4.7%
1.1%

Healthcare

3.7%
16.8%

Communication Services

3.6%
10.6%

Utilities

3.0%
6.5%

Financial Services

DVOL
18.8%
FDL
15.1%

Industrials

DVOL
16.6%
FDL
3.8%

Energy

DVOL
14.0%
FDL
27.3%

Real Estate

DVOL
12.1%
FDL

-

Consumer Cyclical

DVOL
9.4%
FDL
3.8%

Consumer Defensive

DVOL
8.2%
FDL
14.7%

Basic Materials

DVOL
6.0%
FDL
0.3%

Technology

DVOL
4.7%
FDL
1.1%

Healthcare

DVOL
3.7%
FDL
16.8%

Communication Services

DVOL
3.6%
FDL
10.6%

Utilities

DVOL
3.0%
FDL
6.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DVOL vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DVOL
DVOL Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
DVOL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DVOL Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
DVOL Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
DVOL Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
DVOL Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

FDL
FDL Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDL Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
FDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDL Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DVOL vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF (DVOL) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DVOLFDLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.02

2.18

-2.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.11

3.35

-3.24

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.38

-0.37

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.04

5.74

-5.70

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.14

14.05

-13.91

DVOL vs. FDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DVOL Sharpe Ratio is 0.02, which is lower than the FDL Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DVOL and FDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DVOLFDLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

2.18

-2.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.89

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.45

+0.04

Drawdowns

DVOL vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DVOL drawdown since its inception was -38.26%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVOL and FDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DVOLFDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.26%

-65.93%

+27.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.82%

-4.27%

-5.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.66%

-12.24%

+0.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.65%

-16.46%

-8.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.24%

-1.92%

-3.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.18%

-9.66%

+2.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

1.75%

+1.16%

Volatility

DVOL vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF (DVOL) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) have volatilities of 2.87% and 2.95%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DVOLFDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.87%

2.95%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.40%

7.87%

+1.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.78%

11.27%

+0.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.40%

14.31%

+0.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.73%

17.11%

+0.62%

DVOL vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

DVOL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than FDL's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

DVOL vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison

DVOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than FDL's 3.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DVOL
First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF
0.69%0.86%0.67%1.28%1.37%0.47%0.60%1.79%0.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
3.67%4.04%4.96%4.58%3.58%4.59%4.48%3.75%3.97%3.18%2.93%3.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


DVOL and FDL have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDL has higher volatility (2.95%) compared to DVOL (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DVOL dropped -38.26% vs FDL's -65.93%.

On 5-year performance, FDL leads with 12.64% vs 6.89% for DVOL. On fees, FDL is cheaper at 0.45% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FDL has performed better with a 12.64% return vs 6.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDL is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DVOL.

FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.67%, compared with 0.69% for DVOL.

DVOL is categorized as Momentum, while FDL is Large Cap Value Equities. DVOL tracks Dorsey Wright Momentum Plus Low Volatility Index, while FDL tracks Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DVOL and 0.45% for FDL.

FDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DVOL and FDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer