DVAL vs. SCHV
DVAL (BrandywineGLOBAL Dynamic U.S. Large Cap Value ETF) and SCHV (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. DVAL is actively managed, while SCHV is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DVAL returned 12.66%/yr vs 18.86%/yr for SCHV. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DVAL charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHV.
Performance
DVAL vs. SCHV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DVAL achieves a 6.15% return, which is significantly lower than SCHV's 15.39% return.
DVAL
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- 1.63%
- YTD
- 6.15%
- 6M
- 7.12%
- 1Y
- 12.93%
- 3Y*
- 12.66%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHV
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 5.65%
- YTD
- 15.39%
- 6M
- 16.00%
- 1Y
- 28.49%
- 3Y*
- 18.86%
- 5Y*
- 10.40%
- 10Y*
- 11.50%
DVAL vs. SCHV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DVAL BrandywineGLOBAL Dynamic U.S. Large Cap Value ETF | 6.15% | 8.74% | 12.84% | 8.73% | 1.78% |
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF | 15.39% | 16.02% | 14.13% | 8.93% | 2.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between DVAL and SCHV is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2022 | 0.92 |
The correlation between DVAL and SCHV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
DVAL vs. SCHV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DVAL
SCHV
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
DVAL
SCHV
Industrials
DVAL
SCHV
Technology
DVAL
SCHV
Consumer Cyclical
DVAL
SCHV
Communication Services
DVAL
SCHV
Healthcare
DVAL
SCHV
Consumer Defensive
DVAL
SCHV
Energy
DVAL
SCHV
Utilities
DVAL
SCHV
Basic Materials
DVAL
SCHV
Real Estate
DVAL
-
SCHV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DVAL vs. SCHV — Risk / Return Rank
DVAL
SCHV
DVAL vs. SCHV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BrandywineGLOBAL Dynamic U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (DVAL) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DVAL | SCHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.48 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.09 | 4.19 | -2.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.71 | 16.96 | -10.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DVAL | SCHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.23 | 2.69 | -1.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.72 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 0.72 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
DVAL vs. SCHV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DVAL drawdown since its inception was -18.11%, smaller than the maximum SCHV drawdown of -37.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVAL and SCHV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DVAL | SCHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.11% | -37.08% | +18.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.20% | -6.83% | +0.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.11% | -15.26% | -2.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.78% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.09% | 0.00% | -1.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.64% | -3.83% | +0.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.93% | 1.69% | +0.24% |
Volatility
DVAL vs. SCHV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BrandywineGLOBAL Dynamic U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (DVAL) is 2.73%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) has a volatility of 3.09%. This indicates that DVAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DVAL | SCHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.73% | 3.09% | -0.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.62% | 8.13% | -0.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.59% | 10.63% | -0.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.24% | 14.51% | -0.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.24% | 16.94% | -2.70% |
DVAL vs. SCHV - Expense Ratio Comparison
DVAL has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHV's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
DVAL vs. SCHV - Dividend Comparison
DVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, more than SCHV's 1.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DVAL BrandywineGLOBAL Dynamic U.S. Large Cap Value ETF | 1.88% | 2.00% | 2.82% | 1.16% | 13.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF | 1.76% | 2.02% | 2.25% | 2.42% | 2.37% | 1.93% | 3.03% | 3.02% | 3.05% | 2.37% | 2.65% | 2.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DVAL and SCHV have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHV has higher volatility (3.09%) compared to DVAL (2.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DVAL dropped -18.11% vs SCHV's -37.08%.
On 3-year performance, SCHV leads with 18.86% vs 12.66% for DVAL. On fees, SCHV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, DVAL has been the lower-risk option at 2.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SCHV has performed better with a 18.86% return vs 12.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for DVAL.
DVAL has the higher dividend yield at 1.88%, compared with 1.76% for SCHV.
They also come from different issuers: BrandywineGLOBAL and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for DVAL and 0.04% for SCHV.
SCHV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DVAL and SCHV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer