DVAL vs. NULG

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

DVAL (BrandywineGLOBAL Dynamic U.S. Large Cap Value ETF) and NULG (Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DVAL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by BrandywineGLOBAL, while NULG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI TIAA ESG USA Large Cap Growth. DVAL is actively managed, while NULG is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DVAL returned 13.12%/yr vs 24.33%/yr for NULG. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DVAL charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for NULG.

Performance

DVAL vs. NULG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BrandywineGLOBAL Dynamic U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (DVAL) and Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF (NULG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DVAL achieves a 8.32% return, which is significantly lower than NULG's 18.24% return.

DVAL

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: 1.71%
• YTD: 8.32%
• 6M: 7.85%
• 1Y: 15.40%
• 3Y*: 13.12%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NULG

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 4.33%
• YTD: 18.24%
• 6M: 17.45%
• 1Y: 30.79%
• 3Y*: 24.33%
• 5Y*: 14.24%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DVAL vs. NULG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
DVAL BrandywineGLOBAL Dynamic U.S. Large Cap Value ETF	8.32%	8.74%	12.84%	8.73%	1.56%
NULG Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF	18.24%	14.07%	23.75%	42.71%	-1.28%

Correlation

The correlation between DVAL and NULG is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2022	0.54

The correlation between DVAL and NULG shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.54 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DVAL vs. NULG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DVAL	NULG
Financial Services	31.9%	6.5%
Industrials	14.8%	8.5%
Technology	11.8%	60.3%
Consumer Cyclical	10.2%	8.7%
Communication Services	10.0%	6.0%
Healthcare	7.9%	5.6%
Consumer Defensive	6.6%	1.8%
Energy	5.6%	-
Utilities	1.1%	-
Basic Materials	0.1%	1.7%
Real Estate	-	1.0%

Return for Risk

DVAL vs. NULG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DVAL

DVAL Risk / Return Rank: 45
DVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
DVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
DVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 39
DVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
DVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 49

NULG

NULG Risk / Return Rank: 48
NULG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
NULG Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
NULG Omega Ratio Rank: 49
NULG Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
NULG Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DVAL vs. NULG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BrandywineGLOBAL Dynamic U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (DVAL) and Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF (NULG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DVAL	NULG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.44	1.71	-0.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.14	2.32	-0.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.30	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.49	2.13	+0.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.99	7.17	+0.82

DVAL vs. NULG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DVAL Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the NULG Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DVAL and NULG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DVAL vs. NULG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DVAL drawdown since its inception was -18.11%, smaller than the maximum NULG drawdown of -36.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVAL and NULG.

Drawdown Indicators

	DVAL	NULG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.11%	-36.17%	+18.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.20%	-14.50%	+8.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.11%	-22.28%	+4.17%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-36.17%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.95%	-0.23%	-0.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.60%	-6.82%	+3.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.93%	4.30%	-2.37%

Volatility

DVAL vs. NULG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BrandywineGLOBAL Dynamic U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (DVAL) is 3.29%, while Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF (NULG) has a volatility of 7.41%. This indicates that DVAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NULG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DVAL	NULG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.29%	7.41%	-4.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.95%	14.68%	-6.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.79%	18.13%	-7.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.23%	21.71%	-7.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.23%	21.45%	-7.22%

DVAL vs. NULG - Expense Ratio Comparison

DVAL has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than NULG's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

DVAL vs. NULG - Dividend Comparison

DVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, more than NULG's 0.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DVAL BrandywineGLOBAL Dynamic U.S. Large Cap Value ETF	1.85%	2.00%	2.82%	1.16%	13.13%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NULG Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF	0.10%	0.11%	0.16%	0.43%	0.40%	5.08%	2.68%	1.10%	3.73%	0.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DVAL and NULG in my portfolio?

DVAL and NULG have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DVAL or NULG?

NULG has higher volatility (7.41%) compared to DVAL (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DVAL dropped -18.11% vs NULG's -36.17%.

Which ETF is better, DVAL or NULG?

On 3-year performance, NULG leads with 24.33% vs 13.12% for DVAL. On fees, NULG is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, DVAL has been the lower-risk option at 3.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DVAL or NULG?

Over the 3-year period, NULG has performed better with a 24.33% return vs 13.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DVAL or NULG?

NULG is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for DVAL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DVAL or NULG?

DVAL has the higher dividend yield at 1.85%, compared with 0.10% for NULG.

What is the main difference between DVAL and NULG?

DVAL is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while NULG is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: BrandywineGLOBAL and Nuveen. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for DVAL and 0.25% for NULG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NULG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.