PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DVAL vs. NULG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DVAL vs. NULG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BrandywineGLOBAL Dynamic U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (DVAL) and Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF (NULG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DVAL vs. NULG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DVAL
BrandywineGLOBAL Dynamic U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
2.49%8.74%12.84%8.73%1.78%
NULG
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF
-7.01%14.07%23.75%42.71%-0.45%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DVAL achieves a 2.49% return, which is significantly higher than NULG's -7.01% return.


DVAL

1D
1.57%
1M
-3.40%
YTD
2.49%
6M
3.51%
1Y
11.25%
3Y*
10.89%
5Y*
10Y*

NULG

1D
3.87%
1M
-4.51%
YTD
-7.01%
6M
-8.45%
1Y
16.31%
3Y*
18.00%
5Y*
10.39%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DVAL vs. NULG - Expense Ratio Comparison

DVAL has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than NULG's 0.25% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

DVAL vs. NULG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DVAL
DVAL Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
DVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
DVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
DVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
DVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

NULG
NULG Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
NULG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NULG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
NULG Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
NULG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
NULG Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DVAL vs. NULG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BrandywineGLOBAL Dynamic U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (DVAL) and Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF (NULG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DVALNULGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.72

0.74

-0.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.12

1.20

-0.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.16

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.01

1.13

-0.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.68

3.82

+0.86

DVAL vs. NULG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DVAL Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is comparable to the NULG Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DVAL and NULG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DVALNULGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

0.74

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.78

-0.07

Correlation

The correlation between DVAL and NULG is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

DVAL vs. NULG - Dividend Comparison

DVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, more than NULG's 0.12% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DVAL
BrandywineGLOBAL Dynamic U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
1.95%2.00%2.82%1.16%13.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NULG
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.12%0.11%0.16%0.43%0.40%5.08%2.68%1.10%3.73%0.61%

Drawdowns

DVAL vs. NULG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DVAL drawdown since its inception was -18.11%, smaller than the maximum NULG drawdown of -36.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVAL and NULG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DVALNULGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.11%

-36.17%

+18.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.21%

-14.50%

+2.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.50%

-11.19%

+6.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.73%

-6.93%

+3.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.64%

4.28%

-1.64%

Volatility

DVAL vs. NULG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BrandywineGLOBAL Dynamic U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (DVAL) is 3.47%, while Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF (NULG) has a volatility of 7.12%. This indicates that DVAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NULG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DVALNULGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.47%

7.12%

-3.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.77%

13.52%

-5.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.68%

22.23%

-6.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.41%

21.47%

-7.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.41%

21.46%

-7.05%