DVAL vs. ELCV

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

DVAL (BrandywineGLOBAL Dynamic U.S. Large Cap Value ETF) and ELCV (Eventide High Dividend ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DVAL returned 18.55% vs 24.40% for ELCV. Their 0.67 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. Both charge a 0.49% expense ratio.

Performance

DVAL vs. ELCV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BrandywineGLOBAL Dynamic U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (DVAL) and Eventide High Dividend ETF (ELCV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DVAL achieves a 13.26% return, which is significantly lower than ELCV's 19.23% return.

DVAL

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 2.88%
• 6M: 8.79%
• YTD: 13.26%
• 1Y: 18.55%
• 3Y*: 12.37%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.11%

ELCV

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: -2.40%
• 6M: 12.57%
• YTD: 19.23%
• 1Y: 24.40%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 15.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DVAL BrandywineGLOBAL Dynamic U.S. Large Cap Value ETF	$286.13K	$154.34K	$233.85K
ELCV Eventide High Dividend ETF	$1.69M	$1.41M	$1.59M

DVAL vs. ELCV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
DVAL BrandywineGLOBAL Dynamic U.S. Large Cap Value ETF	13.26%	8.74%	-2.13%
ELCV Eventide High Dividend ETF	19.23%	9.96%	-0.64%

Correlation

The correlation between DVAL and ELCV is 0.59, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2024	0.67

The correlation between DVAL and ELCV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

DVAL vs. ELCV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DVAL

DVAL Risk / Return Rank: 73
DVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
DVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
DVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 66
DVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
DVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 75

ELCV

ELCV Risk / Return Rank: 83
ELCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
ELCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
ELCV Omega Ratio Rank: 78
ELCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
ELCV Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DVAL vs. ELCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BrandywineGLOBAL Dynamic U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (DVAL) and Eventide High Dividend ETF (ELCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DVAL	ELCV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.63	1.88	-0.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.41	2.59	-0.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.33	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.79	3.66	-0.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.36	13.88	-4.53

DVAL vs. ELCV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DVAL Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the ELCV Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DVAL and ELCV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DVAL vs. ELCV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DVAL drawdown since its inception was -18.11%, roughly equal to the maximum ELCV drawdown of -18.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVAL and ELCV.

Drawdown Indicators

	DVAL	ELCV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.11%	-18.38%	+0.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.20%	-6.54%	+0.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.11%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.80%	-4.83%	+4.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.50%	-3.59%	+0.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.84%	1.72%	+0.12%

Volatility

DVAL vs. ELCV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BrandywineGLOBAL Dynamic U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (DVAL) is 3.03%, while Eventide High Dividend ETF (ELCV) has a volatility of 3.96%. This indicates that DVAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ELCV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DVAL	ELCV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.03%	3.96%	-0.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.73%	9.91%	-2.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.61%	12.78%	-2.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.11%	15.47%	-1.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.11%	15.47%	-1.36%

DVAL vs. ELCV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DVAL and ELCV have an expense ratio of 0.49%.

Dividends

DVAL vs. ELCV - Dividend Comparison

DVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, less than ELCV's 2.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
DVAL BrandywineGLOBAL Dynamic U.S. Large Cap Value ETF	1.77%	2.00%	2.82%	1.16%	13.13%
ELCV Eventide High Dividend ETF	2.15%	2.34%	0.29%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DVAL and ELCV in my portfolio?

DVAL and ELCV have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DVAL or ELCV?

ELCV has higher volatility (3.96%) compared to DVAL (3.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DVAL dropped -18.11% vs ELCV's -18.38%.

Which ETF is better, DVAL or ELCV?

On 1-year performance, ELCV leads with 24.40% vs 18.55% for DVAL. Both ETFs have the same 0.49% expense ratio. On volatility, DVAL has been the lower-risk option at 3.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DVAL or ELCV?

Over the 1-year period, ELCV has performed better with a 24.40% return vs 18.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DVAL or ELCV?

DVAL and ELCV have the same expense ratio: 0.49% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DVAL or ELCV?

ELCV has the higher dividend yield at 2.15%, compared with 1.77% for DVAL.

What is the main difference between DVAL and ELCV?

They also come from different issuers: BrandywineGLOBAL and Eventide.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ELCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.