DVAL vs. MFVL
DVAL (BrandywineGLOBAL Dynamic U.S. Large Cap Value ETF) and MFVL (Motley Fool Value Factor ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DVAL charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for MFVL.
Performance
DVAL vs. MFVL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DVAL achieves a 6.15% return, which is significantly higher than MFVL's 0.39% return.
DVAL
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- 1.63%
- YTD
- 6.15%
- 6M
- 7.12%
- 1Y
- 12.93%
- 3Y*
- 12.66%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MFVL
- 1D
- -1.06%
- 1M
- 0.90%
- YTD
- 0.39%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DVAL vs. MFVL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DVAL BrandywineGLOBAL Dynamic U.S. Large Cap Value ETF | 6.15% | 1.76% |
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF | 0.39% | 1.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between DVAL and MFVL is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025 | 0.65 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DVAL vs. MFVL — Risk / Return Rank
DVAL
MFVL
DVAL vs. MFVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BrandywineGLOBAL Dynamic U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (DVAL) and Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DVAL | MFVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.09 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.71 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DVAL | MFVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.23 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 0.31 | +0.45 |
Drawdowns
DVAL vs. MFVL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DVAL drawdown since its inception was -18.11%, which is greater than MFVL's maximum drawdown of -7.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVAL and MFVL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DVAL | MFVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.11% | -7.03% | -11.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.20% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.09% | -3.29% | +2.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.64% | -2.42% | -1.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.93% | — | — |
Volatility
DVAL vs. MFVL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DVAL | MFVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.73% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.62% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.59% | 12.15% | -1.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.24% | 12.15% | +2.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.24% | 12.15% | +2.09% |
DVAL vs. MFVL - Expense Ratio Comparison
DVAL has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than MFVL's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
DVAL vs. MFVL - Dividend Comparison
DVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, while MFVL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DVAL BrandywineGLOBAL Dynamic U.S. Large Cap Value ETF | 1.88% | 2.00% | 2.82% | 1.16% | 13.13% |
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DVAL and MFVL have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DVAL is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DVAL is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for MFVL.
DVAL has the higher dividend yield at 1.88%, compared with 0.00% for MFVL.
They also come from different issuers: BrandywineGLOBAL and Motley Fool. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for DVAL and 0.50% for MFVL.
Find the right allocation for DVAL and MFVL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer