DURPX vs. SCHG
Compare and contrast key facts about DFA US High Relative Profitability Portfolio (DURPX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).
DURPX is managed by Dimensional. It was launched on May 16, 2017. SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009.
Performance
DURPX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DURPX vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DURPX DFA US High Relative Profitability Portfolio | -2.70% | 12.81% | 20.49% | 21.85% | -11.82% | 25.27% | 19.29% | 33.11% | -5.11% | 17.77% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | -9.73% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -31.80% | 28.11% | 39.14% | 36.02% | -1.36% | 13.82% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DURPX achieves a -2.70% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's -9.73% return.
DURPX
- 1D
- 2.63%
- 1M
- -5.64%
- YTD
- -2.70%
- 6M
- -2.67%
- 1Y
- 12.05%
- 3Y*
- 15.23%
- 5Y*
- 10.95%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHG
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- -4.46%
- YTD
- -9.73%
- 6M
- -8.15%
- 1Y
- 17.00%
- 3Y*
- 22.30%
- 5Y*
- 12.76%
- 10Y*
- 16.95%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DURPX vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
DURPX has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
DURPX vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
DURPX
SCHG
DURPX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA US High Relative Profitability Portfolio (DURPX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DURPX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.71 | 0.76 | -0.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.13 | 1.24 | -0.12 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.17 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.08 | 1.09 | -0.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.01 | 3.71 | +1.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DURPX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 | 0.76 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.57 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 0.79 | -0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between DURPX and SCHG is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DURPX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
DURPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, more than SCHG's 0.43% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DURPX DFA US High Relative Profitability Portfolio | 1.09% | 1.05% | 1.20% | 1.49% | 3.65% | 4.12% | 1.34% | 1.36% | 1.69% | 0.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.43% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Drawdowns
DURPX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DURPX drawdown since its inception was -31.02%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DURPX and SCHG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DURPX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.02% | -34.59% | +3.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.29% | -16.41% | +4.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.90% | -34.59% | +12.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.27% | -12.51% | +6.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.12% | -5.22% | +1.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.64% | 4.84% | -2.20% |
Volatility
DURPX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DFA US High Relative Profitability Portfolio (DURPX) is 4.95%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 6.77%. This indicates that DURPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DURPX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.95% | 6.77% | -1.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.82% | 12.54% | -3.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.36% | 22.45% | -5.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.91% | 22.31% | -6.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.69% | 21.51% | -3.82% |