DURPX vs. DFUSX
Compare and contrast key facts about DFA US High Relative Profitability Portfolio (DURPX) and DFA U.S. Large Company Portfolio (DFUSX).
DURPX is managed by Dimensional. It was launched on May 16, 2017. DFUSX is managed by Dimensional. It was launched on Sep 23, 1999.
Performance
DURPX vs. DFUSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DURPX vs. DFUSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DURPX DFA US High Relative Profitability Portfolio | -5.20% | 12.81% | 20.49% | 21.85% | -11.82% | 25.27% | 19.29% | 33.11% | -5.11% | 17.77% |
DFUSX DFA U.S. Large Company Portfolio | -7.05% | 17.76% | 24.91% | 26.28% | -18.14% | 28.53% | 18.41% | 32.08% | -4.45% | 12.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DURPX achieves a -5.20% return, which is significantly higher than DFUSX's -7.05% return.
DURPX
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- -8.03%
- YTD
- -5.20%
- 6M
- -4.57%
- 1Y
- 9.36%
- 3Y*
- 14.23%
- 5Y*
- 10.61%
- 10Y*
- —
DFUSX
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- -7.66%
- YTD
- -7.05%
- 6M
- -4.63%
- 1Y
- 14.38%
- 3Y*
- 17.12%
- 5Y*
- 11.34%
- 10Y*
- 13.60%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DURPX vs. DFUSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DURPX has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than DFUSX's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
DURPX vs. DFUSX — Risk / Return Rank
DURPX
DFUSX
DURPX vs. DFUSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA US High Relative Profitability Portfolio (DURPX) and DFA U.S. Large Company Portfolio (DFUSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DURPX | DFUSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.60 | 0.85 | -0.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.98 | 1.32 | -0.35 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.20 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.69 | 0.87 | -0.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.27 | 4.25 | -0.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DURPX | DFUSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 | 0.85 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 | 0.68 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.76 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 0.42 | +0.35 |
Correlation
The correlation between DURPX and DFUSX is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DURPX vs. DFUSX - Dividend Comparison
DURPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, less than DFUSX's 1.14% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DURPX DFA US High Relative Profitability Portfolio | 1.11% | 1.05% | 1.20% | 1.49% | 3.65% | 4.12% | 1.34% | 1.36% | 1.69% | 0.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DFUSX DFA U.S. Large Company Portfolio | 1.14% | 1.04% | 1.24% | 4.17% | 6.24% | 6.57% | 3.82% | 2.74% | 2.64% | 1.56% | 1.95% | 2.87% |
Drawdowns
DURPX vs. DFUSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DURPX drawdown since its inception was -31.02%, smaller than the maximum DFUSX drawdown of -54.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DURPX and DFUSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DURPX | DFUSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.02% | -54.96% | +23.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.29% | -12.10% | -0.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.90% | -24.58% | +2.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.67% | -8.88% | +0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.12% | -10.66% | +6.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.61% | 2.62% | -0.01% |
Volatility
DURPX vs. DFUSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DFA US High Relative Profitability Portfolio (DURPX) is 3.95%, while DFA U.S. Large Company Portfolio (DFUSX) has a volatility of 4.25%. This indicates that DURPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFUSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DURPX | DFUSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.95% | 4.25% | -0.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.43% | 8.64% | -0.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.20% | 17.96% | -0.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.86% | 16.83% | -0.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.68% | 18.03% | -0.35% |