PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DUHP vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DUHP vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional US High Profitability ETF (DUHP) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DUHP achieves a 8.79% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 4.99% return.


DUHP

1D
-0.27%
1M
-1.01%
6M
7.04%
YTD
8.79%
1Y
16.27%
3Y*
16.06%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.05%

SCHG

1D
1.12%
1M
0.15%
6M
7.02%
YTD
4.99%
1Y
16.16%
3Y*
21.39%
5Y*
13.15%
10Y*
18.27%
ALL TIME*
16.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$29.95M$29.57M$35.23M
$247.66M$249.87M$339.91M

DUHP vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DUHP
Dimensional US High Profitability ETF
8.79%13.77%19.49%21.11%-0.03%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
4.99%17.50%34.95%50.10%-17.53%

Correlation

The correlation between DUHP and SCHG is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2022

0.84

The correlation between DUHP and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

DUHP vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DUHP
SCHG

Technology

37.0%
44.0%

Industrials

15.8%
7.6%

Healthcare

13.0%
9.9%

Financial Services

9.1%
7.7%

Consumer Cyclical

9.0%
11.2%

Consumer Defensive

7.0%
1.9%

Communication Services

5.6%
14.1%

Energy

2.0%
0.9%

Utilities

1.0%
0.5%

Basic Materials

0.7%
1.6%

Real Estate

-

0.6%

Technology

DUHP
37.0%
SCHG
44.0%

Industrials

DUHP
15.8%
SCHG
7.6%

Healthcare

DUHP
13.0%
SCHG
9.9%

Financial Services

DUHP
9.1%
SCHG
7.7%

Consumer Cyclical

DUHP
9.0%
SCHG
11.2%

Consumer Defensive

DUHP
7.0%
SCHG
1.9%

Communication Services

DUHP
5.6%
SCHG
14.1%

Energy

DUHP
2.0%
SCHG
0.9%

Utilities

DUHP
1.0%
SCHG
0.5%

Basic Materials

DUHP
0.7%
SCHG
1.6%

Real Estate

DUHP

-

SCHG
0.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DUHP vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DUHP
DUHP Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
DUHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DUHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
DUHP Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
DUHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
DUHP Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DUHP vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US High Profitability ETF (DUHP) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DUHPSCHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.15

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.70

0.83

+0.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.26

2.62

+4.64

DUHP vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DUHP Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is higher than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DUHP and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DUHP vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DUHP drawdown since its inception was -20.05%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUHP and SCHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DUHPSCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.05%

-34.59%

+14.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.99%

-16.41%

+7.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.86%

-23.39%

+5.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.67%

-3.10%

+1.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.93%

-5.19%

+1.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

5.19%

-3.09%

Volatility

DUHP vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional US High Profitability ETF (DUHP) is 2.87%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 4.32%. This indicates that DUHP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DUHPSCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.87%

4.32%

-1.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.63%

12.90%

-3.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.90%

16.67%

-4.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.19%

22.42%

-6.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.19%

21.59%

-5.40%

DUHP vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

DUHP has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DUHP vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

DUHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, more than SCHG's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DUHP
Dimensional US High Profitability ETF
0.93%1.02%1.13%1.51%1.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.38%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


DUHP and SCHG have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHG has higher volatility (4.32%) compared to DUHP (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DUHP dropped -20.05% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

On 3-year performance, SCHG leads with 21.39% vs 16.06% for DUHP. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, DUHP has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 21.39% return vs 16.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.21% for DUHP.

DUHP has the higher dividend yield at 0.93%, compared with 0.38% for SCHG.

DUHP is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.21% for DUHP and 0.04% for SCHG.

DUHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DUHP and SCHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer