PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DUHP vs. DFUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DUHP vs. DFUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF (DUHP) and Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF (DFUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DUHP achieves a 7.22% return, which is significantly lower than DFUS's 8.60% return.


DUHP

1D
-1.81%
1M
-0.02%
YTD
7.22%
6M
6.35%
1Y
18.29%
3Y*
17.83%
5Y*
10Y*

DFUS

1D
-1.68%
1M
-0.94%
YTD
8.60%
6M
7.51%
1Y
24.34%
3Y*
20.81%
5Y*
12.74%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DUHP vs. DFUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DUHP
DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF
7.22%13.77%19.49%21.11%-0.03%
DFUS
Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF
8.60%17.46%24.34%26.36%-7.84%

Correlation

The correlation between DUHP and DFUS is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2022

0.95

The correlation between DUHP and DFUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

DUHP vs. DFUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DUHP
DFUS

Technology

36.7%
37.7%

Industrials

15.9%
9.4%

Healthcare

12.9%
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.1%
10.2%

Financial Services

8.8%
11.7%

Consumer Defensive

7.4%
4.4%

Communication Services

5.3%
10.1%

Energy

2.1%
3.5%

Utilities

0.9%
2.2%

Basic Materials

0.6%
2.0%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Technology

DUHP
36.7%
DFUS
37.7%

Industrials

DUHP
15.9%
DFUS
9.4%

Healthcare

DUHP
12.9%
DFUS
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

DUHP
9.1%
DFUS
10.2%

Financial Services

DUHP
8.8%
DFUS
11.7%

Consumer Defensive

DUHP
7.4%
DFUS
4.4%

Communication Services

DUHP
5.3%
DFUS
10.1%

Energy

DUHP
2.1%
DFUS
3.5%

Utilities

DUHP
0.9%
DFUS
2.2%

Basic Materials

DUHP
0.6%
DFUS
2.0%

Real Estate

DUHP

-

DFUS
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DUHP vs. DFUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DUHP
DUHP Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
DUHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DUHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
DUHP Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
DUHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
DUHP Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

DFUS
DFUS Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
DFUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFUS Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
DFUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DUHP vs. DFUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF (DUHP) and Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF (DFUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DUHPDFUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.34

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.04

2.73

-0.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.82

12.07

-3.25

DUHP vs. DFUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DUHP Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the DFUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DUHP and DFUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DUHP vs. DFUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DUHP drawdown since its inception was -20.05%, smaller than the maximum DFUS drawdown of -24.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUHP and DFUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DUHPDFUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.05%

-24.62%

+4.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.99%

-8.96%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.86%

-19.44%

+1.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.47%

-3.03%

+0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.00%

-5.78%

+1.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.08%

2.02%

+0.06%

Volatility

DUHP vs. DFUS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF (DUHP) is 4.83%, while Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF (DFUS) has a volatility of 5.17%. This indicates that DUHP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DUHPDFUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.83%

5.17%

-0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.62%

10.20%

-0.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.87%

12.97%

-1.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.32%

17.29%

-0.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.32%

17.26%

-0.94%

DUHP vs. DFUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DUHP has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is higher than DFUS's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DUHP vs. DFUS - Dividend Comparison

DUHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, more than DFUS's 0.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
DFUS
Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF
0.85%0.88%1.04%1.33%1.48%0.85%
DUHP
DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF
0.99%1.02%1.13%1.51%1.10%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, DUHP and DFUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DFUS has higher volatility (5.17%) compared to DUHP (4.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DUHP dropped -20.05% vs DFUS's -24.62%.

On 3-year performance, DFUS leads with 20.81% vs 17.83% for DUHP. On fees, DFUS is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, DUHP has been the lower-risk option at 4.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DFUS has performed better with a 20.81% return vs 17.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DFUS is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.21% for DUHP.

DUHP has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.85% for DFUS.

Their fees differ too: 0.21% for DUHP and 0.09% for DFUS.

DFUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DUHP and DFUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer