DUBS vs. UPSD
DUBS (Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF) and UPSD (Aptus Large Cap Upside ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DUBS is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Aptus, while UPSD is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by Aptus. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DUBS returned 25.42% vs 17.98% for UPSD. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DUBS charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for UPSD.
Performance
DUBS vs. UPSD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DUBS achieves a 12.09% return, which is significantly higher than UPSD's 8.40% return.
DUBS
- 1D
- -0.78%
- 1M
- 1.64%
- 6M
- 10.34%
- YTD
- 12.09%
- 1Y
- 25.42%
- 3Y*
- 20.18%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UPSD
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 3.67%
- 6M
- 5.99%
- YTD
- 8.40%
- 1Y
- 17.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DUBS vs. UPSD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
DUBS Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF | 12.09% | 19.28% | -0.52% |
UPSD Aptus Large Cap Upside ETF | 8.40% | 12.83% | -4.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between DUBS and UPSD is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2024 | 0.90 |
The correlation between DUBS and UPSD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DUBS vs. UPSD — Risk / Return Rank
DUBS
UPSD
DUBS vs. UPSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF (DUBS) and Aptus Large Cap Upside ETF (UPSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DUBS | UPSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.23 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.08 | 1.52 | +1.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.50 | 5.94 | +7.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DUBS vs. UPSD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DUBS drawdown since its inception was -18.48%, smaller than the maximum UPSD drawdown of -23.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUBS and UPSD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DUBS | UPSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.48% | -23.85% | +5.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.29% | -11.91% | +3.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.48% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.99% | -0.15% | -0.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.95% | -3.79% | +1.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.89% | 3.03% | -1.14% |
Volatility
DUBS vs. UPSD - Volatility Comparison
Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF (DUBS) and Aptus Large Cap Upside ETF (UPSD) have volatilities of 4.22% and 4.11%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DUBS | UPSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.22% | 4.11% | +0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.75% | 11.04% | -0.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.54% | 14.31% | -0.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.65% | 20.79% | -6.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.65% | 20.79% | -6.14% |
DUBS vs. UPSD - Expense Ratio Comparison
DUBS has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than UPSD's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
DUBS vs. UPSD - Dividend Comparison
DUBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, more than UPSD's 0.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DUBS Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF | 2.00% | 2.06% | 2.52% | 1.14% |
UPSD Aptus Large Cap Upside ETF | 0.66% | 0.67% | 0.06% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DUBS and UPSD have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DUBS has higher volatility (4.22%) compared to UPSD (4.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DUBS dropped -18.48% vs UPSD's -23.85%.
On 1-year performance, DUBS leads with 25.42% vs 17.98% for UPSD. On fees, DUBS is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, UPSD has been the lower-risk option at 4.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DUBS has performed better with a 25.42% return vs 17.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DUBS is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for UPSD.
DUBS has the higher dividend yield at 2.00%, compared with 0.66% for UPSD.
DUBS is categorized as Derivative Income, while UPSD is Actively Managed. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for DUBS and 0.79% for UPSD.
DUBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DUBS and UPSD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer