PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DUBS vs. UPSD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DUBS vs. UPSD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF (DUBS) and Aptus Large Cap Upside ETF (UPSD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DUBS achieves a 12.09% return, which is significantly higher than UPSD's 8.40% return.


DUBS

1D
-0.78%
1M
1.64%
6M
10.34%
YTD
12.09%
1Y
25.42%
3Y*
20.18%
5Y*
10Y*

UPSD

1D
-0.15%
1M
3.67%
6M
5.99%
YTD
8.40%
1Y
17.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DUBS vs. UPSD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
DUBS
Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF
12.09%19.28%-0.52%
UPSD
Aptus Large Cap Upside ETF
8.40%12.83%-4.67%

Correlation

The correlation between DUBS and UPSD is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2024

0.90

The correlation between DUBS and UPSD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DUBS vs. UPSD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DUBS
DUBS Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
DUBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DUBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
DUBS Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
DUBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
DUBS Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

UPSD
UPSD Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
UPSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UPSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
UPSD Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
UPSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
UPSD Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DUBS vs. UPSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF (DUBS) and Aptus Large Cap Upside ETF (UPSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DUBSUPSDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.23

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

1.52

+1.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.50

5.94

+7.56

DUBS vs. UPSD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DUBS Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is higher than the UPSD Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DUBS and UPSD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DUBS vs. UPSD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DUBS drawdown since its inception was -18.48%, smaller than the maximum UPSD drawdown of -23.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUBS and UPSD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DUBSUPSDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.48%

-23.85%

+5.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.29%

-11.91%

+3.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.99%

-0.15%

-0.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.95%

-3.79%

+1.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.89%

3.03%

-1.14%

Volatility

DUBS vs. UPSD - Volatility Comparison

Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF (DUBS) and Aptus Large Cap Upside ETF (UPSD) have volatilities of 4.22% and 4.11%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DUBSUPSDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.22%

4.11%

+0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.75%

11.04%

-0.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.54%

14.31%

-0.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.65%

20.79%

-6.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.65%

20.79%

-6.14%

DUBS vs. UPSD - Expense Ratio Comparison

DUBS has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than UPSD's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

DUBS vs. UPSD - Dividend Comparison

DUBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, more than UPSD's 0.66% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
DUBS
Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF
2.00%2.06%2.52%1.14%
UPSD
Aptus Large Cap Upside ETF
0.66%0.67%0.06%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DUBS and UPSD have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DUBS has higher volatility (4.22%) compared to UPSD (4.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DUBS dropped -18.48% vs UPSD's -23.85%.

On 1-year performance, DUBS leads with 25.42% vs 17.98% for UPSD. On fees, DUBS is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, UPSD has been the lower-risk option at 4.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DUBS has performed better with a 25.42% return vs 17.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DUBS is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for UPSD.

DUBS has the higher dividend yield at 2.00%, compared with 0.66% for UPSD.

DUBS is categorized as Derivative Income, while UPSD is Actively Managed. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for DUBS and 0.79% for UPSD.

DUBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DUBS and UPSD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer