PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DUBS vs. SPXM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DUBS vs. SPXM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF (DUBS) and Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DUBS

1D
-0.77%
1M
0.36%
6M
10.95%
YTD
12.20%
1Y
25.29%
3Y*
20.03%
5Y*
10Y*

SPXM

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
6M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
1Y
8.72%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DUBS vs. SPXM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
DUBS
Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF
12.20%12.42%
SPXM
Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF
0.00%9.27%

Correlation

The correlation between DUBS and SPXM is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2025

0.52

The correlation between DUBS and SPXM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DUBS vs. SPXM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DUBS
DUBS Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
DUBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DUBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
DUBS Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
DUBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
DUBS Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

SPXM
SPXM Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
SPXM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXM Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXM Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DUBS vs. SPXM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF (DUBS) and Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DUBSSPXMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.39

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

2.11

+0.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.43

9.87

+3.55

DUBS vs. SPXM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DUBS Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is higher than the SPXM Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DUBS and SPXM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DUBS vs. SPXM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DUBS drawdown since its inception was -18.48%, which is greater than SPXM's maximum drawdown of -5.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUBS and SPXM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DUBSSPXMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.48%

-5.08%

-13.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.29%

-5.08%

-3.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.89%

-0.75%

-0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.94%

-0.78%

-1.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.89%

Volatility

DUBS vs. SPXM - Volatility Comparison

Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF (DUBS) has a higher volatility of 3.52% compared to Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM) at 0.00%. This indicates that DUBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPXM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DUBSSPXMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.52%

0.00%

+3.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.77%

3.78%

+6.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.53%

7.65%

+5.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.63%

7.59%

+7.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.63%

7.59%

+7.04%

DUBS vs. SPXM - Expense Ratio Comparison

DUBS has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than SPXM's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

DUBS vs. SPXM - Dividend Comparison

DUBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, more than SPXM's 0.24% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
DUBS
Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF
1.99%2.06%2.52%1.14%
SPXM
Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF
0.24%0.24%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DUBS and SPXM have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DUBS has higher volatility (3.52%) compared to SPXM (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DUBS dropped -18.48% vs SPXM's -5.08%.

On 1-year performance, DUBS leads with 25.29% vs 8.72% for SPXM. On fees, DUBS is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, SPXM has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DUBS has performed better with a 25.29% return vs 8.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DUBS is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for SPXM.

DUBS has the higher dividend yield at 1.99%, compared with 0.24% for SPXM.

DUBS is categorized as Derivative Income, while SPXM is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Aptus and Azoria. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for DUBS and 0.47% for SPXM.

DUBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DUBS and SPXM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer