DUBS vs. SPTM
DUBS (Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF) and SPTM (SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. DUBS is actively managed, while SPTM is passively managed. Over the past year, DUBS returned 32.48% vs 28.51% for SPTM. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. DUBS charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SPTM.
Performance
DUBS vs. SPTM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DUBS achieves a 13.00% return, which is significantly higher than SPTM's 11.57% return.
DUBS
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 5.12%
- YTD
- 13.00%
- 6M
- 13.09%
- 1Y
- 32.48%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPTM
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 4.45%
- YTD
- 11.57%
- 6M
- 11.50%
- 1Y
- 28.51%
- 3Y*
- 22.16%
- 5Y*
- 13.47%
- 10Y*
- 15.23%
DUBS vs. SPTM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DUBS Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF | 13.00% | 19.28% | 24.08% | 8.10% |
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF | 11.57% | 16.93% | 23.87% | 10.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between DUBS and SPTM is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2023 | 0.97 |
The correlation between DUBS and SPTM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
DUBS vs. SPTM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DUBS
SPTM
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
DUBS
SPTM
Financial Services
DUBS
SPTM
Communication Services
DUBS
SPTM
Consumer Cyclical
DUBS
SPTM
Healthcare
DUBS
SPTM
Industrials
DUBS
SPTM
Consumer Defensive
DUBS
SPTM
Energy
DUBS
SPTM
Utilities
DUBS
SPTM
Real Estate
DUBS
SPTM
Basic Materials
DUBS
SPTM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DUBS vs. SPTM — Risk / Return Rank
DUBS
SPTM
DUBS vs. SPTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF (DUBS) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DUBS | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.44 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.94 | 3.30 | +0.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.74 | 15.38 | +3.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DUBS | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.57 | 2.41 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.53 | 0.46 | +1.07 |
Drawdowns
DUBS vs. SPTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DUBS drawdown since its inception was -18.48%, smaller than the maximum SPTM drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUBS and SPTM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DUBS | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.48% | -54.80% | +36.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.29% | -8.68% | +0.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.19% | -0.25% | +0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.94% | -9.05% | +7.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.74% | 1.86% | -0.12% |
Volatility
DUBS vs. SPTM - Volatility Comparison
Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF (DUBS) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) have volatilities of 2.69% and 2.82%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DUBS | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.69% | 2.82% | -0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.47% | 8.93% | +0.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.72% | 11.87% | +0.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.54% | 16.86% | -2.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.54% | 18.03% | -3.49% |
DUBS vs. SPTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
DUBS has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTM's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
DUBS vs. SPTM - Dividend Comparison
DUBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, more than SPTM's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DUBS Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF | 1.93% | 2.06% | 2.52% | 1.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF | 1.03% | 1.13% | 1.28% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.56% | 1.72% | 1.90% | 1.66% | 1.91% | 1.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, DUBS and SPTM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SPTM has higher volatility (2.82%) compared to DUBS (2.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DUBS dropped -18.48% vs SPTM's -54.80%.
On 1-year performance, DUBS leads with 32.48% vs 28.51% for SPTM. On fees, SPTM is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, DUBS has been the lower-risk option at 2.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DUBS has performed better with a 32.48% return vs 28.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPTM is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for DUBS.
DUBS has the higher dividend yield at 1.93%, compared with 1.03% for SPTM.
They also come from different issuers: Aptus and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for DUBS and 0.03% for SPTM.
DUBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DUBS and SPTM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer