DUBS vs. DFND
DUBS (Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF) and DFND (Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. DUBS is actively managed, while DFND is passively managed. Over the past year, DUBS returned 32.48% vs 1.01% for DFND. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DUBS charges 0.39%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for DFND.
Performance
DUBS vs. DFND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DUBS
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 5.12%
- YTD
- 13.00%
- 6M
- 13.09%
- 1Y
- 32.48%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFND
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.06%
- 1Y
- 1.01%
- 3Y*
- 8.09%
- 5Y*
- 4.54%
- 10Y*
- 7.15%
DUBS vs. DFND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DUBS Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF | 13.00% | 19.28% | 24.08% | 8.10% |
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF | 0.00% | 10.37% | 8.48% | 4.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between DUBS and DFND is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2023 | 0.22 |
DUBS vs. DFND - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DUBS
DFND
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
-
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
DUBS
DFND
Financial Services
DUBS
DFND
Communication Services
DUBS
DFND
Consumer Cyclical
DUBS
DFND
Healthcare
DUBS
DFND
Industrials
DUBS
DFND
Consumer Defensive
DUBS
DFND
Energy
DUBS
DFND
Utilities
DUBS
DFND
-
Real Estate
DUBS
DFND
Basic Materials
DUBS
DFND
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DUBS vs. DFND — Risk / Return Rank
DUBS
DFND
DUBS vs. DFND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF (DUBS) and Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DUBS | DFND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.04 | +0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.94 | 0.35 | +3.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.74 | 0.64 | +18.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DUBS | DFND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.57 | 0.11 | +2.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.21 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.53 | 0.36 | +1.17 |
Drawdowns
DUBS vs. DFND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DUBS drawdown since its inception was -18.48%, smaller than the maximum DFND drawdown of -22.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUBS and DFND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DUBS | DFND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.48% | -22.65% | +4.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.29% | -3.44% | -4.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -22.65% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.19% | -3.69% | +3.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.94% | -5.70% | +3.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.74% | 3.71% | -1.97% |
Volatility
DUBS vs. DFND - Volatility Comparison
Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF (DUBS) has a higher volatility of 2.69% compared to Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND) at 0.00%. This indicates that DUBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DUBS | DFND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.69% | 0.00% | +2.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.47% | 6.13% | +3.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.72% | 10.92% | +1.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.54% | 22.45% | -7.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.54% | 19.08% | -4.54% |
DUBS vs. DFND - Expense Ratio Comparison
DUBS has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than DFND's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
DUBS vs. DFND - Dividend Comparison
DUBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, more than DFND's 0.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF | 0.62% | 1.10% | 1.64% | 1.84% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.77% | 0.53% | 0.02% |
DUBS Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF | 1.93% | 2.06% | 2.52% | 1.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DUBS and DFND have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DUBS has higher volatility (2.69%) compared to DFND (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DUBS dropped -18.48% vs DFND's -22.65%.
On 1-year performance, DUBS leads with 32.48% vs 1.01% for DFND. On fees, DUBS is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, DFND has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DUBS has performed better with a 32.48% return vs 1.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DUBS is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DFND.
DUBS has the higher dividend yield at 1.93%, compared with 0.62% for DFND.
They also come from different issuers: Aptus and SRN Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for DUBS and 1.50% for DFND.
DUBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DUBS and DFND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer