DUBS vs. AMDW

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

DUBS (Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF) and AMDW (Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DUBS returned 27.76% vs 214.50% for AMDW. Their 0.56 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. DUBS charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for AMDW.

Performance

DUBS vs. AMDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF (DUBS) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DUBS achieves a 13.77% return, which is significantly lower than AMDW's 150.89% return.

DUBS

• 1D: 1.35%
• 1M: 2.18%
• 6M: 12.14%
• YTD: 13.77%
• 1Y: 27.76%
• 3Y*: 21.04%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 20.96%

AMDW

• 1D: 1.68%
• 1M: -8.62%
• 6M: 113.70%
• YTD: 150.89%
• 1Y: 214.50%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 231.82%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF	$10.29M	$9.36M	$8.60M
DUBS Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF	$881.48K	$1.25M	$931.41K

DUBS vs. AMDW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DUBS Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF	13.77%	10.31%
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF	150.89%	36.56%

Correlation

The correlation between DUBS and AMDW is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025	0.56

The correlation between DUBS and AMDW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

DUBS vs. AMDW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DUBS	AMDW
Technology	38.4%	19.3%
Financial Services	11.5%	-
Communication Services	9.9%	-
Consumer Cyclical	9.6%	-
Healthcare	8.9%	-
Industrials	8.5%	-
Consumer Defensive	4.5%	-
Energy	3.0%	-
Utilities	2.2%	-
Real Estate	1.8%	-
Basic Materials	1.7%	-

Return for Risk

DUBS vs. AMDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DUBS

DUBS Risk / Return Rank: 83
DUBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
DUBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
DUBS Omega Ratio Rank: 81
DUBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
DUBS Martin Ratio Rank: 89

AMDW

AMDW Risk / Return Rank: 89
AMDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
AMDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
AMDW Omega Ratio Rank: 83
AMDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
AMDW Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DUBS vs. AMDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF (DUBS) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DUBS	AMDW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.02	2.52	-0.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.73	3.02	-0.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.37	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.36	6.23	-2.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.49	12.22	+2.27

DUBS vs. AMDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DUBS Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the AMDW Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DUBS and AMDW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DUBS vs. AMDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DUBS drawdown since its inception was -18.48%, smaller than the maximum AMDW drawdown of -34.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUBS and AMDW.

Drawdown Indicators

	DUBS	AMDW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.48%	-34.64%	+16.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.29%	-34.64%	+26.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.48%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-20.07%	+20.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.93%	-13.99%	+12.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.92%	17.63%	-15.71%

Volatility

DUBS vs. AMDW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF (DUBS) is 3.96%, while Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW) has a volatility of 28.57%. This indicates that DUBS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DUBS	AMDW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.96%	28.57%	-24.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.83%	66.95%	-56.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.81%	85.77%	-71.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.64%	84.89%	-70.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.64%	84.89%	-70.25%

DUBS vs. AMDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

DUBS has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than AMDW's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

DUBS vs. AMDW - Dividend Comparison

DUBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, less than AMDW's 55.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF	55.51%	34.78%	0.00%	0.00%
DUBS Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF	1.97%	2.06%	2.52%	1.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DUBS and AMDW in my portfolio?

DUBS and AMDW have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DUBS or AMDW?

AMDW has higher volatility (28.57%) compared to DUBS (3.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DUBS dropped -18.48% vs AMDW's -34.64%.

Which ETF is better, DUBS or AMDW?

On 1-year performance, AMDW leads with 214.50% vs 27.76% for DUBS. On fees, DUBS is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, DUBS has been the lower-risk option at 3.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DUBS or AMDW?

Over the 1-year period, AMDW has performed better with a 214.50% return vs 27.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DUBS or AMDW?

DUBS is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AMDW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DUBS or AMDW?

AMDW has the higher dividend yield at 55.51%, compared with 1.97% for DUBS.

What is the main difference between DUBS and AMDW?

They also come from different issuers: Aptus and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for DUBS and 0.99% for AMDW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AMDW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.