PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DTAN vs. ITAN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DTAN vs. ITAN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sparkline International Intangible Value ETF (DTAN) and Sparkline Intangible Value ETF (ITAN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DTAN achieves a 6.74% return, which is significantly lower than ITAN's 15.94% return.


DTAN

1D
0.02%
1M
3.97%
YTD
6.74%
6M
9.56%
1Y
18.99%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ITAN

1D
-0.42%
1M
8.25%
YTD
15.94%
6M
18.39%
1Y
40.91%
3Y*
23.85%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DTAN vs. ITAN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
DTAN
Sparkline International Intangible Value ETF
6.74%29.52%-0.36%
ITAN
Sparkline Intangible Value ETF
15.94%20.46%9.95%

Correlation

The correlation between DTAN and ITAN is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2024

0.72

The correlation between DTAN and ITAN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DTAN vs. ITAN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DTAN
DTAN Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
DTAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DTAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
DTAN Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
DTAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
DTAN Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

ITAN
ITAN Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
ITAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITAN Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
ITAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITAN Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DTAN vs. ITAN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sparkline International Intangible Value ETF (DTAN) and Sparkline Intangible Value ETF (ITAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DTANITANDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.25

2.87

-1.63

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.79

3.88

-2.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.48

-0.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.47

4.50

-3.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.12

17.43

-12.31

DTAN vs. ITAN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DTAN Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the ITAN Sharpe Ratio of 2.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DTAN and ITAN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DTANITANDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

2.87

-1.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.17

0.66

+0.51

Drawdowns

DTAN vs. ITAN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DTAN drawdown since its inception was -17.58%, smaller than the maximum ITAN drawdown of -30.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DTAN and ITAN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DTANITANDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.58%

-30.41%

+12.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.32%

-9.03%

-4.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.70%

-0.42%

-0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.93%

-7.62%

+4.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.82%

2.33%

+1.49%

Volatility

DTAN vs. ITAN - Volatility Comparison

Sparkline International Intangible Value ETF (DTAN) has a higher volatility of 4.17% compared to Sparkline Intangible Value ETF (ITAN) at 3.78%. This indicates that DTAN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ITAN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DTANITANDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.17%

3.78%

+0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.68%

10.37%

+1.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.28%

14.30%

+0.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.59%

19.05%

-1.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.59%

19.05%

-1.46%

DTAN vs. ITAN - Expense Ratio Comparison

DTAN has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than ITAN's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

DTAN vs. ITAN - Dividend Comparison

DTAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, more than ITAN's 0.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
DTAN
Sparkline International Intangible Value ETF
1.64%1.58%0.67%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ITAN
Sparkline Intangible Value ETF
0.99%0.94%1.14%1.01%0.57%0.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


DTAN and ITAN have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DTAN has higher volatility (4.17%) compared to ITAN (3.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DTAN dropped -17.58% vs ITAN's -30.41%.

On 1-year performance, ITAN leads with 40.91% vs 18.99% for DTAN. On fees, ITAN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, ITAN has been the lower-risk option at 3.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ITAN has performed better with a 40.91% return vs 18.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ITAN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for DTAN.

DTAN has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 0.99% for ITAN.

DTAN is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while ITAN is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for DTAN and 0.50% for ITAN.

ITAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DTAN and ITAN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer