DRUP vs. QCLR
Compare and contrast key facts about GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF (DRUP) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR).
DRUP and QCLR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DRUP is a passively managed fund by GraniteShares that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq US Large Cap Select Disruptors Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Oct 7, 2019. QCLR is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Quarterly Collar 95-110 Index. It was launched on Aug 25, 2021. Both DRUP and QCLR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
DRUP vs. QCLR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DRUP vs. QCLR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRUP GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF | -18.03% | 18.18% | 23.11% | 42.32% | -28.18% | 5.88% |
QCLR Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF | -6.67% | 11.27% | 20.27% | 28.87% | -18.87% | 3.02% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DRUP achieves a -18.03% return, which is significantly lower than QCLR's -6.67% return.
DRUP
- 1D
- 2.94%
- 1M
- -5.98%
- YTD
- -18.03%
- 6M
- -16.05%
- 1Y
- 5.30%
- 3Y*
- 14.82%
- 5Y*
- 8.20%
- 10Y*
- —
QCLR
- 1D
- 1.60%
- 1M
- -5.31%
- YTD
- -6.67%
- 6M
- -5.64%
- 1Y
- 10.86%
- 3Y*
- 12.72%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DRUP vs. QCLR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both DRUP and QCLR have an expense ratio of 0.60%.
Return for Risk
DRUP vs. QCLR — Risk / Return Rank
DRUP
QCLR
DRUP vs. QCLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF (DRUP) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DRUP | QCLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.22 | 0.91 | -0.68 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.50 | 1.35 | -0.86 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.17 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.21 | 1.06 | -0.85 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.68 | 4.33 | -3.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DRUP | QCLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 | 0.91 | -0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.53 | +0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between DRUP and QCLR is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DRUP vs. QCLR - Dividend Comparison
DRUP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QCLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.95%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRUP GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.40% | 0.51% | 0.28% | 0.53% | 0.19% |
QCLR Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF | 15.95% | 14.89% | 8.89% | 0.47% | 0.27% | 1.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
DRUP vs. QCLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRUP drawdown since its inception was -31.29%, which is greater than QCLR's maximum drawdown of -21.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRUP and QCLR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRUP | QCLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.29% | -21.77% | -9.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.21% | -10.22% | -12.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.44% | -8.78% | -11.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.26% | -6.32% | -1.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.10% | 2.50% | +4.60% |
Volatility
DRUP vs. QCLR - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF (DRUP) has a higher volatility of 6.74% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR) at 3.86%. This indicates that DRUP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QCLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DRUP | QCLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.74% | 3.86% | +2.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.38% | 8.53% | +5.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.87% | 12.06% | +11.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.44% | 12.61% | +8.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.17% | 12.61% | +10.56% |