QCLR vs. TQQQ
QCLR (Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF) and TQQQ (ProShares UltraPro QQQ) are both exchange-traded funds - QCLR is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Quarterly Collar 95-110 Index, while TQQQ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QCLR returned 13.84%/yr vs 69.92%/yr for TQQQ. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QCLR charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for TQQQ.
Performance
QCLR vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QCLR achieves a 1.40% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 65.71% return.
QCLR
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 1.43%
- YTD
- 1.40%
- 6M
- 0.03%
- 1Y
- 12.06%
- 3Y*
- 13.84%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TQQQ
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- 33.57%
- YTD
- 65.71%
- 6M
- 58.23%
- 1Y
- 145.30%
- 3Y*
- 69.92%
- 5Y*
- 29.86%
- 10Y*
- 45.44%
QCLR vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QCLR Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF | 1.40% | 11.27% | 20.27% | 28.87% | -18.87% | 3.02% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 65.71% | 34.35% | 58.27% | 198.04% | -79.09% | 17.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between QCLR and TQQQ is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2021 | 0.86 |
The correlation between QCLR and TQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
QCLR vs. TQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QCLR
TQQQ
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
Technology
QCLR
TQQQ
Communication Services
QCLR
TQQQ
Consumer Cyclical
QCLR
TQQQ
Consumer Defensive
QCLR
TQQQ
Healthcare
QCLR
TQQQ
Industrials
QCLR
TQQQ
Utilities
QCLR
TQQQ
Basic Materials
QCLR
TQQQ
Energy
QCLR
TQQQ
Financial Services
QCLR
TQQQ
Real Estate
QCLR
TQQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QCLR vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
QCLR
TQQQ
QCLR vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QCLR | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.23 | 3.07 | -1.84 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.69 | 3.19 | -1.50 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.42 | -0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.22 | 4.08 | -2.86 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.39 | 13.38 | -8.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QCLR | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.23 | 3.07 | -1.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.74 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
QCLR vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QCLR drawdown since its inception was -21.77%, smaller than the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCLR and TQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QCLR | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.77% | -81.66% | +59.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.22% | -36.97% | +26.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.58% | -58.04% | +44.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -81.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -81.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.89% | 0.00% | -0.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.20% | -18.53% | +12.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.84% | 11.28% | -8.44% |
Volatility
QCLR vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR) is 0.47%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 13.26%. This indicates that QCLR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QCLR | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.47% | 13.26% | -12.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.25% | 36.05% | -28.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.82% | 47.63% | -37.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.43% | 66.55% | -54.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.43% | 65.98% | -53.55% |
QCLR vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
QCLR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
QCLR vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison
QCLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.68%, more than TQQQ's 0.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QCLR Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF | 14.68% | 14.89% | 8.89% | 0.47% | 0.27% | 1.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 0.36% | 0.65% | 1.27% | 1.26% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, QCLR and TQQQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
TQQQ has higher volatility (13.26%) compared to QCLR (0.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QCLR dropped -21.77% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.
On 3-year performance, TQQQ leads with 69.92% vs 13.84% for QCLR. On fees, QCLR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, QCLR has been the lower-risk option at 0.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 69.92% return vs 13.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QCLR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TQQQ.
QCLR has the higher dividend yield at 14.68%, compared with 0.36% for TQQQ.
QCLR is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while TQQQ is Leveraged Equities. QCLR tracks NASDAQ-100 Quarterly Collar 95-110 Index, while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: Global X and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QCLR and 0.95% for TQQQ.
TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QCLR and TQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer