PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QCLR vs. TQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QCLR vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QCLR achieves a 1.40% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 65.71% return.


QCLR

1D
0.02%
1M
1.43%
YTD
1.40%
6M
0.03%
1Y
12.06%
3Y*
13.84%
5Y*
10Y*

TQQQ

1D
1.37%
1M
33.57%
YTD
65.71%
6M
58.23%
1Y
145.30%
3Y*
69.92%
5Y*
29.86%
10Y*
45.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QCLR vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QCLR
Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF
1.40%11.27%20.27%28.87%-18.87%3.02%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
65.71%34.35%58.27%198.04%-79.09%17.98%

Correlation

The correlation between QCLR and TQQQ is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2021

0.86

The correlation between QCLR and TQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

QCLR vs. TQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QCLR
TQQQ

Technology

53.8%
53.8%

Communication Services

15.8%
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%
7.7%

Healthcare

4.2%
4.2%

Industrials

2.9%
2.8%

Utilities

1.4%
1.4%

Basic Materials

1.1%
1.1%

Energy

0.6%
0.6%

Financial Services

0.2%
0.2%

Real Estate

0.1%
0.1%

Technology

QCLR
53.8%
TQQQ
53.8%

Communication Services

QCLR
15.8%
TQQQ
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

QCLR
12.2%
TQQQ
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

QCLR
7.7%
TQQQ
7.7%

Healthcare

QCLR
4.2%
TQQQ
4.2%

Industrials

QCLR
2.9%
TQQQ
2.8%

Utilities

QCLR
1.4%
TQQQ
1.4%

Basic Materials

QCLR
1.1%
TQQQ
1.1%

Energy

QCLR
0.6%
TQQQ
0.6%

Financial Services

QCLR
0.2%
TQQQ
0.2%

Real Estate

QCLR
0.1%
TQQQ
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QCLR vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QCLR
QCLR Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
QCLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QCLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
QCLR Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
QCLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
QCLR Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QCLR vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QCLRTQQQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.23

3.07

-1.84

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.69

3.19

-1.50

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.42

-0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.22

4.08

-2.86

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.39

13.38

-8.99

QCLR vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QCLR Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is lower than the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 3.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QCLR and TQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QCLRTQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.23

3.07

-1.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.74

-0.07

Drawdowns

QCLR vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QCLR drawdown since its inception was -21.77%, smaller than the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCLR and TQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QCLRTQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.77%

-81.66%

+59.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.22%

-36.97%

+26.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.58%

-58.04%

+44.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-81.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.89%

0.00%

-0.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.20%

-18.53%

+12.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.84%

11.28%

-8.44%

Volatility

QCLR vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR) is 0.47%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 13.26%. This indicates that QCLR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QCLRTQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.47%

13.26%

-12.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.25%

36.05%

-28.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.82%

47.63%

-37.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.43%

66.55%

-54.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.43%

65.98%

-53.55%

QCLR vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

QCLR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

QCLR vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

QCLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.68%, more than TQQQ's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QCLR
Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF
14.68%14.89%8.89%0.47%0.27%1.64%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.36%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, QCLR and TQQQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TQQQ has higher volatility (13.26%) compared to QCLR (0.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QCLR dropped -21.77% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.

On 3-year performance, TQQQ leads with 69.92% vs 13.84% for QCLR. On fees, QCLR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, QCLR has been the lower-risk option at 0.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 69.92% return vs 13.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QCLR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TQQQ.

QCLR has the higher dividend yield at 14.68%, compared with 0.36% for TQQQ.

QCLR is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while TQQQ is Leveraged Equities. QCLR tracks NASDAQ-100 Quarterly Collar 95-110 Index, while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: Global X and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QCLR and 0.95% for TQQQ.

TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QCLR and TQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer