DRUP vs. FPX
DRUP (GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF) and FPX (First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - DRUP tracks the Nasdaq US Large Cap Select Disruptors Index - Benchmark TR Gross while FPX tracks the IPOX-100 U.S. Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DRUP returned 9.27%/yr vs 9.54%/yr for FPX. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DRUP charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.57%/yr for FPX.
Performance
DRUP vs. FPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DRUP achieves a -3.78% return, which is significantly lower than FPX's 15.77% return.
DRUP
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 4.97%
- 6M
- -4.10%
- YTD
- -3.78%
- 1Y
- 4.84%
- 3Y*
- 16.43%
- 5Y*
- 9.27%
- 10Y*
- —
FPX
- 1D
- -3.28%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- 6M
- 11.78%
- YTD
- 15.77%
- 1Y
- 33.20%
- 3Y*
- 27.83%
- 5Y*
- 9.54%
- 10Y*
- 14.31%
DRUP vs. FPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRUP GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF | -3.78% | 18.18% | 23.11% | 42.32% | -28.18% | 26.13% | 28.71% | 11.72% |
FPX First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF | 15.77% | 37.62% | 24.75% | 22.26% | -35.11% | 3.69% | 47.89% | 6.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between DRUP and FPX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2019 | 0.79 |
Over the past year, the correlation between DRUP and FPX has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
DRUP vs. FPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DRUP
FPX
Technology
Healthcare
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Technology
DRUP
FPX
Healthcare
DRUP
FPX
Communication Services
DRUP
FPX
Industrials
DRUP
FPX
Consumer Cyclical
DRUP
FPX
Real Estate
DRUP
FPX
Financial Services
DRUP
FPX
Basic Materials
DRUP
-
FPX
Consumer Defensive
DRUP
-
FPX
Energy
DRUP
-
FPX
Utilities
DRUP
-
FPX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRUP vs. FPX — Risk / Return Rank
DRUP
FPX
DRUP vs. FPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF (DRUP) and First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF (FPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DRUP | FPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.23 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.21 | 2.72 | -2.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.50 | 8.33 | -7.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DRUP vs. FPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRUP drawdown since its inception was -31.29%, smaller than the maximum FPX drawdown of -56.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRUP and FPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRUP | FPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.29% | -56.29% | +25.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.21% | -12.28% | -10.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.77% | -30.88% | +7.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.29% | -43.14% | +11.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.14% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.61% | -8.19% | +1.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.42% | -11.29% | +2.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.77% | 4.00% | +5.77% |
Volatility
DRUP vs. FPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF (DRUP) is 5.59%, while First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF (FPX) has a volatility of 11.19%. This indicates that DRUP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRUP | FPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.59% | 11.19% | -5.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.81% | 19.50% | -2.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.20% | 25.40% | -5.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.93% | 26.97% | -5.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.19% | 24.48% | -1.29% |
DRUP vs. FPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DRUP has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than FPX's 0.57% expense ratio.
Dividends
DRUP vs. FPX - Dividend Comparison
DRUP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRUP GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.40% | 0.51% | 0.28% | 0.53% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FPX First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF | 0.45% | 0.53% | 0.09% | 0.27% | 1.08% | 0.14% | 0.28% | 0.67% | 0.88% | 0.68% | 0.77% | 0.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DRUP and FPX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FPX has higher volatility (11.19%) compared to DRUP (5.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRUP dropped -31.29% vs FPX's -56.29%.
On 5-year performance, FPX leads with 9.54% vs 9.27% for DRUP. On fees, FPX is cheaper at 0.57% per year. On volatility, DRUP has been the lower-risk option at 5.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FPX has performed better with a 9.54% return vs 9.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FPX is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DRUP.
FPX has the higher dividend yield at 0.45%, compared with 0.00% for DRUP.
DRUP tracks Nasdaq US Large Cap Select Disruptors Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while FPX tracks IPOX-100 U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DRUP and 0.57% for FPX.
FPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DRUP and FPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer