DRS vs. IONQ
DRS (Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock) and IONQ (IonQ, Inc.) are both stocks. DRS operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials), while IONQ operates in Computer Hardware (Technology). Over the past 3 years, DRS returned 40.85%/yr vs 84.76%/yr for IONQ. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DRS vs. IONQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DRS having a 37.48% return and IONQ slightly lower at 36.35%.
DRS
- 1D
- -3.81%
- 1M
- 12.72%
- YTD
- 37.48%
- 6M
- 39.15%
- 1Y
- 2.22%
- 3Y*
- 40.85%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IONQ
- 1D
- 5.76%
- 1M
- 17.77%
- YTD
- 36.35%
- 6M
- 32.80%
- 1Y
- 61.68%
- 3Y*
- 84.76%
- 5Y*
- 42.45%
- 10Y*
- —
DRS vs. IONQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRS Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock | 37.48% | 6.56% | 61.23% | 56.81% | 10.65% |
IONQ IonQ, Inc. | 36.35% | 7.42% | 237.13% | 259.13% | -30.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between DRS and IONQ is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2022 | 0.31 |
Fundamentals
DRS:
$1.44
IONQ:
$0.86
DRS:
32.45
IONQ:
70.97
DRS:
2.55
IONQ:
105.09
DRS:
$3.70B
IONQ:
$187.12M
DRS:
$894.00M
IONQ:
$71.25M
DRS:
$433.00M
IONQ:
$405.86M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRS vs. IONQ — Risk / Return Rank
DRS
IONQ
DRS vs. IONQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock (DRS) and IonQ, Inc. (IONQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DRS | IONQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.18 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.07 | 0.92 | -0.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.14 | 1.66 | -1.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DRS vs. IONQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRS drawdown since its inception was -32.48%, smaller than the maximum IONQ drawdown of -90.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRS and IONQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRS | IONQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.48% | -90.00% | +57.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.48% | -67.61% | +35.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.48% | -67.61% | +35.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -90.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.06% | -25.47% | +19.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.25% | -50.86% | +43.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.06% | 37.23% | -21.17% |
Volatility
DRS vs. IONQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock (DRS) is 14.30%, while IonQ, Inc. (IONQ) has a volatility of 31.85%. This indicates that DRS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IONQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRS | IONQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.30% | 31.85% | -17.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.06% | 69.01% | -36.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.81% | 93.54% | -52.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.77% | 100.55% | -61.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.77% | 97.52% | -58.75% |
Dividends
DRS vs. IONQ - Dividend Comparison
DRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, while IONQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
DRS Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock | 0.77% | 1.06% |
IONQ IonQ, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
DRS vs. IONQ - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock and IonQ, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
DRS and IONQ have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IONQ has higher volatility (31.85%) compared to DRS (14.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRS dropped -32.48% vs IONQ's -90.00%.
IONQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.66 vs 0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DRS and IONQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer