FIP vs. STRL

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about FTAI Infrastructure Inc. (FIP) and Sterling Construction Company, Inc. (STRL).

Performance

FIP vs. STRL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FTAI Infrastructure Inc. (FIP) and Sterling Construction Company, Inc. (STRL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FIP vs. STRL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
FIP FTAI Infrastructure Inc.	7.78%	-34.92%	89.46%	36.92%	10.57%
STRL Sterling Construction Company, Inc.	32.99%	81.79%	91.57%	168.08%	31.89%

Fundamentals

Market Cap FIP : $574.49M STRL : $12.69B
EPS FIP : -$1.26 STRL : $9.37
PS Ratio FIP : 1.14 STRL : 5.06
Total Revenue (TTM) FIP : $502.52M STRL : $2.49B
Gross Profit (TTM) FIP : $38.71M STRL : $572.31M
EBITDA (TTM) FIP : $34.70M STRL : $479.85M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIP achieves a 7.78% return, which is significantly lower than STRL's 32.99% return.

FIP

• 1D: 4.88%
• 1M: -14.41%
• YTD: 7.78%
• 6M: 14.75%
• 1Y: 11.72%
• 3Y*: 20.97%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

STRL

• 1D: 6.46%
• 1M: -4.87%
• YTD: 32.99%
• 6M: 19.90%
• 1Y: 259.75%
• 3Y*: 120.71%
• 5Y*: 77.46%
• 10Y*: 54.90%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

FIP vs. STRL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIP

FIP Risk / Return Rank: 47
FIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
FIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
FIP Omega Ratio Rank: 48
FIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
FIP Martin Ratio Rank: 45

STRL

STRL Risk / Return Rank: 97
STRL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
STRL Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
STRL Omega Ratio Rank: 96
STRL Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
STRL Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIP vs. STRL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FTAI Infrastructure Inc. (FIP) and Sterling Construction Company, Inc. (STRL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FIP	STRL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.16	4.39	-4.23
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.77	3.82	-3.05
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.52	-0.43
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.19	8.08	-7.90
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.34	23.59	-23.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FIP vs. STRL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIP Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is lower than the STRL Sharpe Ratio of 4.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIP and STRL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FIP	STRL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16	4.39	-4.23
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.54	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	1.09	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.36	0.23	+0.13

Correlation

The correlation between FIP and STRL is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

FIP vs. STRL - Dividend Comparison

FIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.43%, while STRL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
FIP FTAI Infrastructure Inc.	2.43%	2.60%	1.65%	3.08%	1.02%
STRL Sterling Construction Company, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

FIP vs. STRL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIP drawdown since its inception was -67.98%, smaller than the maximum STRL drawdown of -92.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIP and STRL.

Drawdown Indicators

	FIP	STRL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.98%	-92.51%	+24.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-43.97%	-31.02%	-12.95%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-47.67%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-59.60%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-50.29%	-11.41%	-38.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.12%	-46.56%	+24.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	24.29%	10.62%	+13.67%

Volatility

FIP vs. STRL - Volatility Comparison

FTAI Infrastructure Inc. (FIP) and Sterling Construction Company, Inc. (STRL) have volatilities of 22.00% and 21.20%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FIP	STRL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.00%	21.20%	+0.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	48.72%	46.74%	+1.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	74.46%	59.69%	+14.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	59.14%	50.46%	+8.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	59.14%	50.44%	+8.70%

Financials

FIP vs. STRL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between FTAI Infrastructure Inc. and Sterling Construction Company, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

FIP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, FTAI Infrastructure Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 143.52M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

STRL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Sterling Construction Company, Inc. reported a gross profit of 164.12M and revenue of 755.61M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.7%.

FIP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, FTAI Infrastructure Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 143.52M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

STRL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Sterling Construction Company, Inc. reported an operating income of 119.97M and revenue of 755.61M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.9%.

FIP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, FTAI Infrastructure Inc. reported a net income of -125.48M and revenue of 143.52M, resulting in a net margin of -87.4%.

STRL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Sterling Construction Company, Inc. reported a net income of 87.60M and revenue of 755.61M, resulting in a net margin of 11.6%.