PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FIP vs. CHLSY
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


FIPCHLSY
YTD Return140.92%-2.35%
1Y Return177.27%1.73%
Sharpe Ratio3.710.27
Sortino Ratio3.800.75
Omega Ratio1.491.13
Calmar Ratio8.450.15
Martin Ratio21.711.23
Ulcer Index8.36%11.20%
Daily Std Dev48.87%49.93%
Max Drawdown-34.91%-89.61%
Current Drawdown-9.87%-87.59%

Fundamentals


FIPCHLSY
Market Cap$1.05B$26.43B
EPS-$1.98$0.33
Total Revenue (TTM)$332.17M$5.33B
Gross Profit (TTM)$76.49M$2.89B
EBITDA (TTM)-$14.42M$1.13B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.0

The correlation between FIP and CHLSY is 0.03, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

FIP vs. CHLSY - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, FIP achieves a 140.92% return, which is significantly higher than CHLSY's -2.35% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
11.42%
11.70%
FIP
CHLSY

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FIP vs. CHLSY - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FTAI Infrastructure Inc. (FIP) and Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG (CHLSY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIP
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FIP, currently valued at 3.71, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.003.71
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FIP, currently valued at 3.80, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.80
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FIP, currently valued at 1.49, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.49
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FIP, currently valued at 8.45, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.45
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FIP, currently valued at 21.71, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0021.71
CHLSY
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CHLSY, currently valued at 0.27, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.27
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CHLSY, currently valued at 0.75, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.75
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CHLSY, currently valued at 1.13, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.13
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CHLSY, currently valued at 0.15, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.15
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CHLSY, currently valued at 1.23, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.001.23

FIP vs. CHLSY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIP Sharpe Ratio is 3.71, which is higher than the CHLSY Sharpe Ratio of 0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIP and CHLSY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.005.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.71
0.27
FIP
CHLSY

Dividends

FIP vs. CHLSY - Dividend Comparison

FIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, more than CHLSY's 1.27% yield.


TTM20232022
FIP
FTAI Infrastructure Inc.
1.30%3.08%1.02%
CHLSY
Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG
1.27%1.17%0.00%

Drawdowns

FIP vs. CHLSY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIP drawdown since its inception was -34.91%, smaller than the maximum CHLSY drawdown of -89.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIP and CHLSY. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-9.87%
-87.59%
FIP
CHLSY

Volatility

FIP vs. CHLSY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FTAI Infrastructure Inc. (FIP) is 13.41%, while Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG (CHLSY) has a volatility of 16.81%. This indicates that FIP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHLSY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
13.41%
16.81%
FIP
CHLSY

Financials

FIP vs. CHLSY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between FTAI Infrastructure Inc. and Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items