PortfoliosLab logo
DRS vs. SCHG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between DRS and SCHG is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.4

Maximize Your Portfolio’s Potential

Does your portfolio have the optimal asset allocation aligned with your goals? Find it out with our portfolio optimizer

Try portfolio optimization now

Performance

DRS vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock (DRS) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
17.97%
-9.02%
DRS
SCHG

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

DRS:

1.53

SCHG:

0.33

Sortino Ratio

DRS:

2.05

SCHG:

0.63

Omega Ratio

DRS:

1.29

SCHG:

1.09

Calmar Ratio

DRS:

2.72

SCHG:

0.34

Martin Ratio

DRS:

7.87

SCHG:

1.42

Ulcer Index

DRS:

7.91%

SCHG:

5.68%

Daily Std Dev

DRS:

40.59%

SCHG:

24.18%

Max Drawdown

DRS:

-22.90%

SCHG:

-34.59%

Current Drawdown

DRS:

-8.18%

SCHG:

-14.52%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRS achieves a 6.34% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's -10.75% return.


DRS

YTD

6.34%

1M

10.94%

6M

11.96%

1Y

64.32%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

SCHG

YTD

-10.75%

1M

-0.89%

6M

-5.39%

1Y

7.94%

5Y*

19.17%

10Y*

14.71%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF

Risk-Adjusted Performance

DRS vs. SCHG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of DRS is 9494
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of DRS is 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of DRS is 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of DRS is 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of DRS is 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of DRS is 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SCHG is 7474
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SCHG is 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SCHG is 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SCHG is 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SCHG is 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SCHG is 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

DRS vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock (DRS) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for DRS, currently valued at 1.55, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.00
DRS: 1.55
SCHG: 0.16
The chart of Sortino ratio for DRS, currently valued at 2.06, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
DRS: 2.06
SCHG: 0.39
The chart of Omega ratio for DRS, currently valued at 1.29, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
DRS: 1.29
SCHG: 1.05
The chart of Calmar ratio for DRS, currently valued at 2.75, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.00
DRS: 2.75
SCHG: 0.17
The chart of Martin ratio for DRS, currently valued at 7.93, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.00
DRS: 7.93
SCHG: 0.67

The current DRS Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is higher than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRS and SCHG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
1.55
0.16
DRS
SCHG

Dividends

DRS vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

DRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than SCHG's 0.46% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
DRS
Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock
0.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.47%0.40%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%1.09%

Drawdowns

DRS vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRS drawdown since its inception was -22.90%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRS and SCHG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-8.98%
-17.75%
DRS
SCHG

Volatility

DRS vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock (DRS) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) have volatilities of 16.16% and 16.00%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
16.16%
16.00%
DRS
SCHG

User Portfolios with DRS or SCHG


GE
RTX
LMT
BA
GD
TDG
NOC
LHX
HWM
HEI
AXON
CW
DRS
BMTX
SCHG
SCHX
SCHV
LQD
QQQ
ACWV
SCHR
USMV
OUNZ
VCIT
1 / 158

Recent discussions