PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRNZ vs. CIFU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRNZ vs. CIFU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in REX Drone ETF (DRNZ) and T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF (CIFU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRNZ achieves a -1.62% return, which is significantly lower than CIFU's 74.19% return.


DRNZ

1D
-3.30%
1M
-12.50%
YTD
-1.62%
6M
-4.89%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CIFU

1D
-10.40%
1M
27.80%
YTD
74.19%
6M
43.22%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRNZ vs. CIFU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
DRNZ
REX Drone ETF
-1.62%18.05%
CIFU
T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF
74.19%-13.41%

Correlation

The correlation between DRNZ and CIFU is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2025

0.48

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRNZ vs. CIFU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX Drone ETF (DRNZ) and T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF (CIFU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DRNZ vs. CIFU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DRNZ vs. CIFU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRNZ drawdown since its inception was -27.02%, smaller than the maximum CIFU drawdown of -77.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRNZ and CIFU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRNZCIFUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.02%

-77.20%

+50.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.02%

-19.79%

-7.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.14%

-42.78%

+30.64%

Volatility

DRNZ vs. CIFU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRNZCIFUDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.18%

206.91%

-155.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.18%

206.91%

-155.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.18%

206.91%

-155.73%

DRNZ vs. CIFU - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRNZ has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than CIFU's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

DRNZ vs. CIFU - Dividend Comparison

Neither DRNZ nor CIFU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


DRNZ and CIFU have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DRNZ is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DRNZ is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CIFU.

DRNZ and CIFU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

DRNZ is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while CIFU is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DRNZ and 1.50% for CIFU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRNZ and CIFU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer