DRNZ vs. WAR

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

DRNZ (REX Drone ETF) and WAR (U.S. Global Technology and Aerospace & Defense ETF) are both Aerospace & Defense funds. DRNZ is passively managed, while WAR is actively managed. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DRNZ charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for WAR.

Performance

DRNZ vs. WAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in REX Drone ETF (DRNZ) and U.S. Global Technology and Aerospace & Defense ETF (WAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

DRNZ

• 1D: -2.51%
• 1M: -9.52%
• YTD: 1.73%
• 6M: -2.62%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WAR

• 1D: -4.72%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRNZ vs. WAR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
DRNZ REX Drone ETF	-9.52%
WAR U.S. Global Technology and Aerospace & Defense ETF	-4.38%

Correlation

The correlation between DRNZ and WAR is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026	0.73

Return for Risk

DRNZ vs. WAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX Drone ETF (DRNZ) and U.S. Global Technology and Aerospace & Defense ETF (WAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

DRNZ vs. WAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRNZ drawdown since its inception was -26.23%, which is greater than WAR's maximum drawdown of -13.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRNZ and WAR.

Drawdown Indicators

	DRNZ	WAR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.23%	-13.13%	-13.10%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-24.53%	-10.38%	-14.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.05%	-5.48%	-6.57%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DRNZ	WAR	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	51.17%	52.90%	-1.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	51.17%	52.90%	-1.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	51.17%	52.90%	-1.73%

DRNZ vs. WAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRNZ has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than WAR's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

DRNZ vs. WAR - Dividend Comparison

Neither DRNZ nor WAR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DRNZ and WAR in my portfolio?

DRNZ and WAR have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DRNZ or WAR?

On fees, WAR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DRNZ or WAR?

WAR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DRNZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DRNZ or WAR?

DRNZ and WAR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between DRNZ and WAR?

They also come from different issuers: REX and US Global. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DRNZ and 0.60% for WAR.