PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRNZ vs. BMNU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRNZ vs. BMNU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in REX Drone ETF (DRNZ) and T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF (BMNU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRNZ achieves a 27.64% return, which is significantly higher than BMNU's -73.22% return.


DRNZ

1D
2.30%
1M
9.00%
YTD
27.64%
6M
32.11%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BMNU

1D
10.82%
1M
-43.61%
YTD
-73.22%
6M
-86.27%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRNZ vs. BMNU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
DRNZ
REX Drone ETF
27.64%-10.89%
BMNU
T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF
-73.22%-78.76%

Correlation

The correlation between DRNZ and BMNU is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2025

0.58

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRNZ vs. BMNU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX Drone ETF (DRNZ) and T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF (BMNU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DRNZ vs. BMNU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DRNZBMNUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

-0.53

+1.01

Drawdowns

DRNZ vs. BMNU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRNZ drawdown since its inception was -24.52%, smaller than the maximum BMNU drawdown of -97.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRNZ and BMNU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRNZBMNUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.52%

-97.05%

+72.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.32%

-96.73%

+91.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.08%

-79.79%

+68.71%

Volatility

DRNZ vs. BMNU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRNZBMNUDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.73%

187.61%

-136.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.73%

187.61%

-136.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.73%

187.61%

-136.88%

DRNZ vs. BMNU - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRNZ has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than BMNU's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

DRNZ vs. BMNU - Dividend Comparison

Neither DRNZ nor BMNU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


DRNZ and BMNU have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DRNZ is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DRNZ is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for BMNU.

DRNZ and BMNU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

DRNZ is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while BMNU is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DRNZ and 1.50% for BMNU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRNZ and BMNU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer